由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - Divided Senate Confirms Notre Dame Professor to U.S. Appeals Court
相关主题
地区联邦法官那个判决到底有没有效?Why Pelosi hates Hillary
听证会气氛紧张啊 Sessions太怂了whose economic policy is better? Dem or GOP?
老川对TU发正式声明了将近200个奥巴马政治捐款大户,在奥巴马政府里搞到了职位
左臂们快来,一起抵制推特这个怂货Anti-Anti-Islam
Nev. federal judge nominee withdraws amid impasse大笑话阿: 穆斯林抱怨天主教大学里到处都是天主教标志
80-20 网站一游 (转载)2012 Presidential Hopefuls Urged to Sign a ‘Pledge for Religious Freedom’
McConnell:就是trump提名Ginsburg,主党也会filibusterNewt是真小人 - Obama是伪君子
401k is only for losersAmerican Catholicism’s Pact With the Devil
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: ms话题: barrett话题: senate话题: democrats话题: professor
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
S*******i
发帖数: 2018
1
http://www.wsj.com/articles/divided-senate-confirms-notre-dame-professor-to-u-s-appeals-court-1509490943?cx_testId=17&cx_testVariant=cx&cx_artPos=0&cx_tag=pol?cx_campaign=poptart&mod=cx_poptart#cxrecs_s
WASHINGTON—The Senate on Tuesday confirmed University of Notre Dame law
professor Amy Barrett for a federal appeals court judgeship, closing for now
a debate about whether it is appropriate for lawmakers to ask a nominee
questions about their religious faith.
Ms. Barrett was confirmed to the Seventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in
Chicago on a 55-43 vote.
President Donald Trump nominated the professor, a former law clerk to the
late Justice Antonin Scalia, in May.
Ms. Barrett’s confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee in
September sparked criticism from some Republicans after a few Democratic
senators, including Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D., Calif.), asked about Ms.
Barrett’s Catholicism and whether she would be able to separate her
religious beliefs from her duty of impartiality as a judge. Ms. Barrett said
she could.
Some GOP lawmakers said the Democrats’ questions suggested they were
imposing a religious test for nominees. Democrats denied the charge and Ms.
Feinstein said the controversy was overblown.
The California senator among other things said she was concerned Ms. Barrett
would be hostile to abortion rights.
Ms. Feinstein and other Democrats said their questions were relevant because
most of Ms. Barrett’s record came from her legal writings, which included
a paper she co-wrote about what a faithful judge should do if the judge
believed she was morally precluded from imposing the death penalty. The
paper said it would be appropriate for a judge presiding over a death case
to recuse.
In the end, three Democrats joined with the Senate’s 52 Republicans in
voting for Ms. Barrett’s confirmation.
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
American Catholicism’s Pact With the DevilNev. federal judge nominee withdraws amid impasse
Sex, Lies, and School Bus Rides80-20 网站一游 (转载)
Holder's Just-Us Department under FireMcConnell:就是trump提名Ginsburg,主党也会filibuster
Are Catholic (and other) Cathedrals an un-Godly extravagance?401k is only for losers
地区联邦法官那个判决到底有没有效?Why Pelosi hates Hillary
听证会气氛紧张啊 Sessions太怂了whose economic policy is better? Dem or GOP?
老川对TU发正式声明了将近200个奥巴马政治捐款大户,在奥巴马政府里搞到了职位
左臂们快来,一起抵制推特这个怂货Anti-Anti-Islam
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: ms话题: barrett话题: senate话题: democrats话题: professor