由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - 猜猜PBS的老总一年挣多少钱?
相关主题
哈哈,老床要搞NPR 和PBS了PBS/NPR 左逼评论员很失望
NPR的funding也被砍了?美国其实没有独立媒体,都是大公司的政治宣传部
WSJ:NPR CEO Resigns Over Hidden VideoNPR: Trump's ceiling is 37% (based on gallop)
看来美俄战争是不可避免了NPR 民主党总统候选人辩论预览
左弊媒体人又被搞疯一个!HRC进入疯狂模式,开始直接攻击川普支持者了
defund NPR: GOP's old rallying cry希拉里的“两个筐子”来了!
[总统辩论] 第一场辩论 收视指南迄今为止看到最好的总结
傅苹造假事件总结(更新至02/20/2013) (转载)[转载]They. Just. Don’t. Fucking. Get it.
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: npr话题: he话题: government话题: wgbh话题: national
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
g********2
发帖数: 6571
1
November 29, 2016
Guess how much a CEO at PBS makes
By John Dietrich
One of the reasons progressives are in panic mode is because many of their
favorite programs are in jeopardy. These programs consume hundreds of
billions of dollars. Their numbers increase with time, and efforts to
eliminate them have been unsuccessful. With Republican control of both
houses of Congress and a businessman as chief executive, this seemingly
impossible task is within reach.
National Public Radio (NPR) and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB
) are not-for-profit organizations. What could be better than that? They
belong to the public, and they are nonprofit. They are high-priority
government programs. During the 2013 government "shutdown," NPR was
provided with $445 million while funds for clinical cancer trials under the
National Institutes of Health were cut. This was the shutdown where
reporter Dana Bash asked Senator Harry Reid, "If you can help one child, why
won't you do it?" Reid responded, "Why, why, why would we want to do that?
" Reid criticized Bash: "To have someone of your intelligence suggest such
a thing maybe means you're as irresponsible and reckless."
Reid is a powerful patron of the arts. He called H.R. 1, a bill to
eliminate the National Endowment of the Humanities, National Endowment of
the Arts, a "mean-spirited bill." He gave these organizations credit for
the cowboy poetry festival held every January in northern Nevada. He
claimed, "Had that program not been around, the tens of thousands of people
who come there every year would not exist."
A premier PBS station is WGBH, which produces more than two thirds of the
nationally distributed programs broadcast by PBS. Several years ago, the
Boston Herald published an article about executives' pay at the station.
The Herald claimed that the "executives were raking in upwards of $200,000 a
year while toiling in the lap of a luxurious $85 million multimedia palace
dubbed the 'Taj Mahal.'" Their headquarters contained a 200-seat
amphitheater, a state-of-the-art recording studio, a Hamburg-Steinway grand
piano, environmentally friendly dual-flush toilets, and waterless urinals.
The Herald reported that WGBH's CEO, Jonathan Abbott, received $425,000 a
year.
Abbott defended the salaries, saying WGBH has to compete for talent with the
country's leading media companies. He is perfectly correct. There is a
market for talent. WGBH has to pay a competitive rate in order to attract
the talent it needs. Without talent, it will lose viewers. If a private
company loses business, it improves its product or goes under. Government-
subsidized companies still must perform; however, the incentive is not as
urgent as it would be in a private company. And why should people who cling
to their Bibles and guns subsidize a corporation that does not have a very
high opinion of them?
NPR is sensitive about criticism of people's religious beliefs. Juan
Williams was fired by NPR for admitting he gets nervous on a plane when he
sees a person dressed in Muslim garb. Somehow they overlooked Andrei
Codrescu's statement on his program All Things Considered: "The evaporation
of four million [people] who believe in this [Christian] crap would leave
this world a better place." This was also the view of NPR's former senior
vice president for fundraising, Ron Schiller. He told a couple of
undercover journalists that "NPR would be better off in the long run without
federal funding." Shortly after that interview, he left NPR under a cloud
for claiming that "Tea Party people" aren't "just Islamaphobic, but really
xenophobic – I mean basically they are, they believe in sort of white,
middle-America gun-toting. I mean, it's scary. They're seriously racist,
racist people."
The article claimed that the station's "freewheeling spending" put it in the
crosshairs of congressional Republicans. Government funding relies to a
large extent on Democratic support. Rep. Doug Lamborn (R-Colo.) told the
Herald, "We know that they can survive on their own. It's time to push Big
Bird out of the nest and let him fly on his own."
NPR reportedly gets only about 10% of its budget from the federal government
. However, if the network's people are informed that the government is
going to defund them, you will hear a sound similar to what you will hear if
you throw a box of day-old donuts into a pen of piglets.
It is a glorious sound. Better than the smell of napalm in the morning.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/11/guess_how_much_a_ceo_at_pbs_makes.html#ixzz4RPVV4CMT
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
[转载]They. Just. Don’t. Fucking. Get it.左弊媒体人又被搞疯一个!
让德国告诉中国,与“难民站在一起”是什么下场!ZZdefund NPR: GOP's old rallying cry
Campbell Soup将其欧洲分部卖掉了[总统辩论] 第一场辩论 收视指南
trump傻逼了傅苹造假事件总结(更新至02/20/2013) (转载)
哈哈,老床要搞NPR 和PBS了PBS/NPR 左逼评论员很失望
NPR的funding也被砍了?美国其实没有独立媒体,都是大公司的政治宣传部
WSJ:NPR CEO Resigns Over Hidden VideoNPR: Trump's ceiling is 37% (based on gallop)
看来美俄战争是不可避免了NPR 民主党总统候选人辩论预览
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: npr话题: he话题: government话题: wgbh话题: national