g********2
发帖数: 6571 | 1 September 7, 2016
How to help Muslim refugees
By Cliff Spectre
The Obama administration is intent on bringing in as many Muslim immigrants
classified as refugees as it can before the election. Is the United States
the best place to settle those refugees?
First, what countries would be closest to the Muslim refugee’s home culture
? Countries with large Muslim minorities almost universally have culture
clashes that all too often result in terror attacks. This is common to
countries around the globe, as witnessed in the Philippines, Australia,
Thailand, India, Canada, Nigeria, Kenya, and multiple countries in Europe as
well as the United States. Polling indicates that an unusually large
number of Muslims worldwide support extremist groups like ISIS and terror
tactics like suicide bombings. It would not be wise to relocate Muslim
refugees into a non-Muslim country with this being the case. The host
country would in effect be a target-rich environment.
In order to avoid such friction, it would be more prudent to settle Muslim
refugees in Muslim majority countries. Consider this:
The Organization for Islamic Cooperation is composed of 56 Islamic
states. It has 26 million square kilometers of land. That is nearly three
times that of the United States and over six times the land mass of the
entire European Union.
There are 1.5 billion people in the OIC. Ten million refugees would
amount to 0.6% of their population.
Qatar is in the OIC and has the highest Gross Domestic Product per
capita of any country in the world. The top 24 also includes OIC member
states Brunei, Kuwait, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Bahrain. OIC countries
have adequate money as well as land area to provide for the Muslim refugees.
Most if not all OIC countries are in the eastern hemisphere. The
eastern hemisphere is where the refugees are from. Therefore, it would be
closer to home for the refugees than if we were to bring them to the other
side of the planet for settlement in the western hemisphere.
The OIC has the land and money, but how could its members be persuaded to
address the problem? The United States in particular spends a lot of
foreign aid on many OIC countries. Pakistan and Indonesia both get U.S.
foreign aid, and they both have large land masses and large Muslim
populations. The U.S. State Department has plenty of diplomats who could
persuade such countries to help.
The left should have no objection to this policy. President Obama said
recently that racism is “part of our DNA.” Hillary Clinton said, “Racism
is America’s original sin.” With this kind of a mindset, why on Earth
would any self-respecting leftist want to bring Middle Eastern Muslims to a
land like America? I’m sure they would agree that it would be much more
harmonious to move the refugees into tolerant, open Muslim societies so they
would not suffer the discrimination that awaits them in the U.S. Right?
It is in the best interest of the United States to reduce immigration
numbers from historical highs to a more manageable level. The refugees are
part of this immigration wave. There are better places for Muslim refugees
to settle than the United States. This is to the benefit of the refugee as
well as the citizens of the United States.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/09/how_to_help_muslim_refugees.html#ixzz4JbCFCKrQ
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook | j*******r
发帖数: 412 | 2 让难民到穆斯林国家，对美国和想过安生日子的难民自身是好事。
但是对全球伊斯兰化进程不是好事，因此侯赛因总统不会支持的。 | g********2
发帖数: 6571 | 3 President Obama said recently that racism is “part of our DNA.” Hillary
Clinton said, “Racism is America’s original sin.” With this kind of a
mindset, why on Earth would any self-respecting leftist want to bring Middle
Eastern Muslims to a land like America?
——同问。 |
|
