b********n
发帖数: 38600 | 1 http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2011/08/obama_the_affirmative_action_president.html
Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as
an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, a baffling breed of mass hysteria
akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder,
did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into
thinking he could manage the world's largest economy, direct the world's
most powerful military, execute the world's most consequential job?
Imagine a future historian examining Obama's pre-presidential life: ushered
into and through the Ivy League despite unremarkable grades and test scores
along the way; a cushy non-job as a "community organizer"; a brief career as
a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly
devoid of his attention, so often did he vote "present"); and finally an
unaccomplished single term in United States Senate, the entirety of which
was devoted to his presidential ambitions. He left no academic legacy in
academia, authored no signature legislation as legislator.
And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating
, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama's "spiritual
mentor"; a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama's colleague and
political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it
all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?
Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed
the question recently in the Wall Street Journal:
To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken
hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill
Ayers would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and
therefore entitled in the eyes of liberaldom to have hung out with
protesters against various American injustices, even if they were a bit
extreme, he was given a pass.
Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass -- held to a lower standard --
because of the color of his skin. Podhoretz continues:
And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also
articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) "non-threatening," all
of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and
thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?
Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama
phenomenon -- affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But
certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and
regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and
especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.
Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on
the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are
not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor
performance and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don't care if
these minority students fail; liberals aren't around to witness the
emotional devastation and deflated self esteem resulting from the racist
policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a
separate standard merely because of the color of his skin -- that's
affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn't racism, then nothing is.
And that is what America did to Obama.
True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why
would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for
Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was
good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois; he was
told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the
Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good
enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary. What
could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time
Obama speaks?
In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless
raved about Obama's oratory skills, intellect, and cool character. Those
people -- conservatives included -- ought now to be deeply embarrassed. The
man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of clichés, and that's when he has
his teleprompter in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely
think or speak at all. Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth
-- it's all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over
again for 100 years.
And what about his character? Obama is constantly blaming anything and
everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited
this mess. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise
his own powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence. But really
, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for anything,
so how do we expect him to act responsibly?
In short: our president is a small and small-minded man, with neither the
temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand that,
and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and
prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such a man in
the Oval Office.
But hey, at least we got to feel good about ourselves for a little while.
And really, isn't that all that matters these days?
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/08/obama_the_affirmative_action_president.html#ixzz4IgG7WVyQ
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook | b********n
发帖数: 38600 | 2 Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not
qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance
and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don't care if these minority
students fail; liberals aren't around to witness the emotional devastation
and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist policy that is
affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard
merely because of the color of his skin - that's affirmative action in a
nutshell, and if that isn't racism, then nothing is. And that is what
America did to Obama. True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of
achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was
good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he
was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in
Illinois ; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record
at all in the Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he
was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the
contrary. | x****d
发帖数: 2239 | |
|
