说句风凉话，加州的老中真是自找的 - USANews版

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档，一周内的贴子最多显示50字，超过一周显示500字访问原贴

USANews版 - 说句风凉话，加州的老中真是自找的

相关主题
● 加州SCA 5其实是华人咎由自取	● 中国城移民更应该支持床铺
● SCA5法案上面，大陆中国人的吃相简直太难看了 (转载)	● 对这几天的骚乱做的感概
● 为什么在这种情况下，我仍然不支持共和党	● 议员Carol Liu在脸书上有关SCA5的回答是这样的
● 反对SCA5，找个人，不用族裔数据 (转载)	● 罪魁赫南德兹：限制亚裔入学提案(SCA5) 不会撤销也不会停止
● 反对SCA-5具体有效的步骤, 请转发	● 包子贴
● 请大家拿出行动，尽点义务：加州AB1726法案下一步将移交health committee	● 一人一票的民主2.0版本已经快要崩溃了 (转载)
● SCA-5不死，我们华裔死	● 加州的亚裔AA态度调查
● 老中都错了，SCA5的问题根本就不是造成不公平竞争！！！ (转载)	● 美国的命运注定是...

相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: email话题: fax话题: tel话题: 老中话题: 加州

进入USANews版参与讨论

(共1页)

x****o
发帖数: 29677

当初几个议员禁鱼翅，老华侨尤其是老广们反对，这帮老中拍手叫好，说什么陋习早该
改了
大陆来美国生孩子搞月子中心，被美国白人举报，这帮老中屁股又坐到那边去，一起谴
责月子中心，恨不能自己亲手取缔，不喜欢大陆人来美国生孩子，生生觉得占了他们的
便宜
看到其他州民主党共和党人杀的难解难分，加州的老中却在洋洋得意的筛自己的小黑屋
，W2，表明自己不关心政治，比薪水比收入比资产比房子比孩子教育
看到一帮老中搞共和党，加州的老中更嗤之以鼻，表明对共和党的不屑，当提到AA时，
更是自豪的说加州禁止AA，以此作为民主党的丰功伟绩，嘲笑共和党的德州
说到自己支持的党派，加州的老中都以民主党自居，并且瞧不起低收入的共和党支持者
，在他们看来，除了亿万富翁资本家，都应该支持民主党才对。当说到自己的工作时，
马上表明码工是高智商工作，黑膜干不了，再AA轮不到自己头上
天有不测风云，三十年河西，三十年河东，既然黑膜看上了加州这块蛋糕，那么民主的
本质就是多数人对少数人的暴政，黑墨们通过选票开始说话了，加州AA教育只是第一步
，下一步，那些公司也要AA，黑墨看上的蛋糕还没有抢不走的。
加州的老中可真为咎由自取

A*****a
发帖数: 52743

虽然是这样，如果醒悟了，也还有救，就怕民主党耍个花招，给个空头promise, 又欣
欣然跑来与其他华人划清界线了

★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 8.6

【在 x****o 的大作中提到】

: 当初几个议员禁鱼翅，老华侨尤其是老广们反对，这帮老中拍手叫好，说什么陋习早该
: 改了
: 大陆来美国生孩子搞月子中心，被美国白人举报，这帮老中屁股又坐到那边去，一起谴
: 责月子中心，恨不能自己亲手取缔，不喜欢大陆人来美国生孩子，生生觉得占了他们的
: 便宜
: 看到其他州民主党共和党人杀的难解难分，加州的老中却在洋洋得意的筛自己的小黑屋
: ，W2，表明自己不关心政治，比薪水比收入比资产比房子比孩子教育
: 看到一帮老中搞共和党，加州的老中更嗤之以鼻，表明对共和党的不屑，当提到AA时，
: 更是自豪的说加州禁止AA，以此作为民主党的丰功伟绩，嘲笑共和党的德州
: 说到自己支持的党派，加州的老中都以民主党自居，并且瞧不起低收入的共和党支持者

f*******r
发帖数: 5301

不用那么多，过两天老墨来个杀光中国人，支持民主党禁枪的老中都笑了

【在 x****o 的大作中提到】

e***s
发帖数: 1397

Totally agree.

【在 x****o 的大作中提到】

T*********I
发帖数: 10729

老中应该
1. 多关心政治，
2. 学习安全使用枪械知识。
3. 拿掉民主党的多数。选共和党

j*****7
发帖数: 4348

看来很有同志向往住在共和党治下的红州嘛，来来来，咱给你们开开眼，看看一位典型
的红州共和党的作为吧。
有位名叫Ethan Couch 的小鬼，去年酒驾撞死了四个人，敬爱的法官大人居然以熊孩子
得了富贵病为由，给判了缓刑，判熊孩子去加州勒戒所疗养去了。这位可爱的法官大人
，Jean Boyd，是县里面GOP的活跃人物。
这民主党治下，自由是多少的问题，共和党治下嘛，就不好说了，搞不好死了后连声儿
响儿都听不见啊。

b*****e
发帖数: 53215

听起来加州被自杀的华人听到响似的

【在 j*****7 的大作中提到】

: 看来很有同志向往住在共和党治下的红州嘛，来来来，咱给你们开开眼，看看一位典型
: 的红州共和党的作为吧。
: 有位名叫Ethan Couch 的小鬼，去年酒驾撞死了四个人，敬爱的法官大人居然以熊孩子
: 得了富贵病为由，给判了缓刑，判熊孩子去加州勒戒所疗养去了。这位可爱的法官大人
: ，Jean Boyd，是县里面GOP的活跃人物。
: 这民主党治下，自由是多少的问题，共和党治下嘛，就不好说了，搞不好死了后连声儿
: 响儿都听不见啊。

H**r
发帖数: 10015

说的对

【在 x****o 的大作中提到】

H**r
发帖数: 10015

不过纵使所有加州老中投共和党，也支撑不了十年，等老墨超过60%的时候，就所向无
敌了

【在 x****o 的大作中提到】

r*********e
发帖数: 7733

华人为什么老被欺负？
华人通常经济条件不错，也很少抱怨，不属于被照顾对象。
华人通常政治白痴，民主党百般虐，华人无怨无悔就是要选它。
总结起来四字，钱多人傻。

【在 j*****7 的大作中提到】

相关主题
● 请大家拿出行动，尽点义务：加州AB1726法案下一步将移交health committee	● 中国城移民更应该支持床铺
● SCA-5不死，我们华裔死	● 对这几天的骚乱做的感概
● 老中都错了，SCA5的问题根本就不是造成不公平竞争！！！ (转载)	● 议员Carol Liu在脸书上有关SCA5的回答是这样的
进入USANews版参与讨论

z*****a
发帖数: 9790

脑残也知道这是“一位”共和党的作为。所以你为了不被某一位共和党歧视，选择被全
体民主党爆菊。
为啥猪党粉丝都是这种逻辑？

【在 j*****7 的大作中提到】

H**r
发帖数: 10015

aglee

【在 z*****a 的大作中提到】

: 脑残也知道这是“一位”共和党的作为。所以你为了不被某一位共和党歧视，选择被全
: 体民主党爆菊。
: 为啥猪党粉丝都是这种逻辑？

a**********t
发帖数: 9684

说得好！

【在 x****o 的大作中提到】

n****g
发帖数: 14743

不能这样说。

【在 x****o 的大作中提到】

T*********I
发帖数: 10729

+1

【在 z*****a 的大作中提到】

: 脑残也知道这是“一位”共和党的作为。所以你为了不被某一位共和党歧视，选择被全
: 体民主党爆菊。
: 为啥猪党粉丝都是这种逻辑？

y***i
发帖数: 11639

支持不支持禁鱼翅，对现在SAC5不会有任何影响吧。

【在 x****o 的大作中提到】

l******t
发帖数: 12659

这个应该从团结华人力量来看问题
有时候不能只看具体议题，而要看是不是可以团结的对象

【在 y***i 的大作中提到】

: 支持不支持禁鱼翅，对现在SAC5不会有任何影响吧。

y***i
发帖数: 11639

支持禁鱼翅就不能团结反对SAC5了？谁啊站出来让我看个新鲜。。。。这思维方式也
太帅了吧。。。。

【在 l******t 的大作中提到】

: 这个应该从团结华人力量来看问题
: 有时候不能只看具体议题，而要看是不是可以团结的对象

h*******e
发帖数: 6167

感觉是有人在鱼翅事件上利益受损，所以这次来浑水摸鱼。

【在 y***i 的大作中提到】

: 支持禁鱼翅就不能团结反对SAC5了？谁啊站出来让我看个新鲜。。。。这思维方式也
: 太帅了吧。。。。

t*******8
发帖数: 3940

【在 x****o 的大作中提到】

相关主题
● 罪魁赫南德兹：限制亚裔入学提案(SCA5) 不会撤销也不会停止	● 加州的亚裔AA态度调查
● 包子贴	● 美国的命运注定是...
● 一人一票的民主2.0版本已经快要崩溃了 (转载)	● 川粉需要想想看
进入USANews版参与讨论

m******t
发帖数: 3041

e***s
发帖数: 1188

re, cant agree more.

k*******g
发帖数: 7321

求仁得仁！

【在 x****o 的大作中提到】

c*****g
发帖数: 21627

re

【在 f*******r 的大作中提到】

: 不用那么多，过两天老墨来个杀光中国人，支持民主党禁枪的老中都笑了

l*********u
发帖数: 2323

这群人从来不研究的，现在加州是民主党的天下，民主党不在乎老中的利益，共和党觉
得加州没搞头，也就不在乎老中的利益。如果凭老中的力量再加上点其他亚裔的力量能
把加州变成让共和党看起来有搞头的州，那你再看看两党的反应就会截然不同了。

e***y
发帖数: 1443

态度决定一切

【在 y***i 的大作中提到】

: 支持禁鱼翅就不能团结反对SAC5了？谁啊站出来让我看个新鲜。。。。这思维方式也
: 太帅了吧。。。。

a***r
发帖数: 2677

老中要是能团结，不贪财，利比里亚早成第二美国了。可怜之人必有可恨之处，都是娘
胎里带来的品性。大伙还是洗洗睡了吧。

r*****g
发帖数: 9999

这个反驳不仅很苍白，而且牛头不对马嘴。

【在 j*****7 的大作中提到】

m********8
发帖数: 7463

对的。
尽管我政治上反对你的观点，但是逻辑上同意上面那位的反驳太苍白

【在 r*****g 的大作中提到】

: 这个反驳不仅很苍白，而且牛头不对马嘴。

T***5
发帖数: 47

.....

【在 r*********e 的大作中提到】

: 华人为什么老被欺负？
: 华人通常经济条件不错，也很少抱怨，不属于被照顾对象。
: 华人通常政治白痴，民主党百般虐，华人无怨无悔就是要选它。
: 总结起来四字，钱多人傻。

相关主题
● 右派不要以为排华法案不会再次发生	● SCA5法案上面，大陆中国人的吃相简直太难看了 (转载)
● 华人真是小聪明大愚蠢，政治正确这事就能看出 (转载)	● 为什么在这种情况下，我仍然不支持共和党
● 加州SCA 5其实是华人咎由自取	● 反对SCA5，找个人，不用族裔数据 (转载)
进入USANews版参与讨论

s*******b
发帖数: 106

对，顺着楼主的逻辑往下说：
加州的老中被墨墨代表推行的sca5欺负时，其它州的老中拍手称快，指出这都是加州老
中自找的。
到了这个趋势蔓延到其它州时，该谁出来说风凉话了？

s*******l
发帖数: 3691

加州老中吃福利的多，难道选共和党? 没看加州巴马健保里面老中比例远超人口比例?
房子出租收现金拿白卡，多幸福? 傻13的W2们连绿卡都没有

s*******s
发帖数: 9926

大家不要觉得今天不是发生在我这里, 发生在加州就觉得无所谓, 不关我的事, 海外中
国人应该团结一致, 才能对抗种族歧视, 一起行动, 大家应该要效法犹太人团结的精神
, 不要等到这趋势蔓延到其他州时, 才后悔莫及, 怎么样对抗SCA-5种族歧视呢? 下面
有教你要怎样做的方法.
本文的网路版本在这里: http://nosca5.blogspot.com/2014/02/sca5.html
反对SCA-5具体有效的步骤, 请转发
从我做起, 从现在做起! 我们还来得及反对SCA5. 目前, 加州众议院的80席中, 有55席
民主党, 25席共和党. 对这个法案SCA5的支持是党派分票, 所以我们只需要保证 2个以
上民主党议员勇敢地站出来, 投票反对, 我们就可以让法案胎死腹中. 现在我们可以做
的是写信给代表我们选区的加州众议员, 去他们的网站给他们写.
Step 1: 下面网站里选Act Now有两个请愿投票, 有时间先去投票, 这样才能壮大声势.
这两个网站都需要注册, 但是Change.org和Whitehouse.gov是最常见的请愿网站, 将
来一定该还有用到的机会, 花点时间注册并不吃亏.
http://www.saynosca5.com/
美亚团结促进会的United Against SCA5 - Please click here to sign letter to
contact your elected representatives选项在收集反对SCA-5的加州民众资料, 可以
很快去填一下.
http://www.uaafa.org/
Step 2: http://findyourrep.legislature.ca.gov/
住在加州的朋友先寻找自己选区的州众议员
Step 3:
可能被影响的民主党州众议员列表, 这一份名单有被精心筛选过, 确定是机率比较高,
不会让大家浪费子弹, 集中火力攻击, 先写好篇文章, 这篇下面有很多范例, 不想写直
接找一篇贴上发给对方也没关系, 最重要是让对方了解有这么多人重视这个问题, 内容
其实不重要, 简单表达意思就够. 但最好是自己能添加一些自己的意见, 能够写一篇自
己的文章是最好, 反正能够发那么多遍, 多花点时间在这里也是值得. 然后将这封信用
Email再加上Facebook用Message发给下面列表所有的人, 我自己试过发一遍, 全部发完
应该不会超过15分钟.
其中中间这种https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/地址的要发比较特别, 一定必须要
是填该选区地址, 才能写电子邮件给他们, 不然不会让你发, 所以如果不是自己选区或
是有可用地址的就不用了.
另外除了最简单的发电子邮件外, 也可以打电话, Fax传真, 登门拜访都可以视情况运
用联络.
Wesley Chesbro (North Coast)
710 E Street, Suite 150, Eureka, CA 95501
Tel: (707) 445-7014 Fax: (707) 445-6607
Email: a********************[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD02
Richard Pan (潘君达) (Sacramento)
2251 Florin Road, Suite 156, Sacramento CA 95822
Phone: (916)-262-0999 Fax: (916)262-0995
Email: a****************[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD09
http://www.drrichardpan.com/contact
https://www.facebook.com/RichardPanMD
Ken Cooley (Sacramento)
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 130, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Tel: (916) 464-1910 Fax: (916) 464-1915
Email: a*******************[email protected] & k*[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD08
http://www.kencooley.com/contact
https://www.facebook.com/ken.cooley
Mariko Yamada (Southern Sacramento Valley, Wine Country, & North Bay)
725 Main Street Suite 206, Woodland, CA 95695
Tel: (530) 662-7867 Fax: (530) 662-6370
Email: a*******************[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD04
http://www.marikoyamada.net/contact
https://www.facebook.com/assemblymember.yamada
Marc Levine (North Bay)
3501 Civic Center Drive, Room 412, San Rafael, CA 94903
Tel: (415) 479-4920 Fax: (415) 479-2123
Email: a*******************[email protected] & l***************[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD10
https://www.facebook.com/joinmarc
Rob Bonta (Central East Bay of the Bay Area)
1515 Clay Street, Ste. 2204, Oakland, CA 94612
Phone: (510) 286-1670 Fax: (510) 286-1888
Email: a******************[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD18
http://www.robbonta.com/contact/
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Assemblymember-Rob-Bonta/160502927367568
Joan Buchanan (East Bay)
2694 Bishop Dr., Ste. 275, San Ramon, CA 94583
Tel: (925) 328-1515 Fax: (925) 328-1514
Email: a*********************[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD16
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Assemblymember-Joan-Buchanan/220573791429818
Tom Ammiano (San Francisco)
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 14300, San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone (415) 557-3013 Fax (415) 557-3015
Email: a********************[email protected] & t*********[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD17
https://www.facebook.com/AssemblymemberTomAmmiano
Phil Ting (丁右立) (San Francisco & San Mateo County)
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 14600, San Francisco, CA 94102
Tel: (415) 557-2312 Fax: (415) 557-1178
Email: a*****************[email protected] & p**[email protected]
i**[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD19
https://www.facebook.com/philtingsf
Kevin Mullin (San Francisco Peninsula)
1528 South El Camino Real, Suite 302, San Mateo, CA 94402
Tel: (650) 349-2200 Fax: (650) 341-4676
Email: a*******************[email protected] & k***[email protected]
i**[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD22
https://www.facebook.com/AssemblymemberKevinMullin
Rich Gordon (San Francisco Peninsula suburbia into Silicon Valley)
5050 El Camino Real, Suite 117, Los Altos, CA 94022
Tel: (650) 691-2121 Fax: (650) 691-2120
Email: a*******************[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD24
https://www.facebook.com/RichGordon24
Paul Fong (方文忠) (Silicon Valley)
2105 South Bascom Avenue, Suite 160, Campbell, CA 95008
Tel: (408) 371-2802 Fax: (408) 371-2809
Email: a*****************[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD28
http://www.paulfongforcouncil.com/#!contact/c1zdo
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Paul-Fong/12907543117
Bob Wieckowski (East Bay and Silicon Valley)
39510 Paseo Padre Parkway, Suite 280, Fremont, CA 94538
Tel: (510) 440-9030 Fax: (510) 440-9035
Email: a***********************[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD25
https://www.facebook.com/bobwieckowski
https://www.facebook.com/Wieckowski4Senate
Mark Stone (Monterey Bay)
701 Ocean Street, 318-B, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Tel: (831) 425-1503 Fax: (831) 425-2570
Email: a******************[email protected] & i**[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD29
http://friendsofmarkstone.org/contact
https://www.facebook.com/AssemblymemberMarkStone
Das Williams (Santa Barbara and Ventura)
101 W. Anapamu Street, Suite A, Santa Barbara, CA 93101
Tel: (805) 564-1649 Fax: (805) 564-1651
Email: a*********************[email protected] & das.williams2014@gmail.
com
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD37
https://www.facebook.com/DasWilliamsPage
Ed Chau (周本立) (San Gabriel Valley)
1255 Corporate Center Dr. Ste 306, Monterey Park, CA 91754
Tel: (323) 264-4949 Fax: (323) 264-4916
Tel: (626) 403-3033 Fax: (626) 403-3022
Email: a*****************[email protected] & e*************[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD49
https://www.facebook.com/edwin.chau.98
Mike Gatto (Eastern end of the San Fernando Valley)
300 East Magnolia Boulevard, Suite 504, Burbank, CA 91502
Tel: (818) 558-3043 Fax: (818) 558-3042
Email: a******************[email protected] & [email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD43
http://mikegatto.com/volunteers/
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Assemblyman-Mike-Gatto/248355458520271
Richard Bloom (West Los Angeles)
2800 28th Street, Suite 150, Santa Monica, CA 90405
Tel: (310) 450-0041 Fax: (310) 450-6090
Email: a******************[email protected] & r*****[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD50
http://www.richardbloom.com/contact
https://www.facebook.com/RichardBloomCampaign
Al Muratsuchi (South Bay, Beach Cities and the Palos Verdes Peninsula)
3460 Torrance Blvd., Suite 306, Torrance, CA 90503
Tel: (310) 316-2164 Fax: (310) 316-2480
Email: a***********************[email protected] & i**[email protected]
m*****[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD66
https://www.facebook.com/almuratsuchi
Sharon Quirk-Silva (North Orange County)
1400 North Harbor Blvd., Suite 601, Fullerton, CA 92835
Tel: (714) 526-7272 Fax: (714) 526-7278
Email: a************************[email protected] & campaign@
sharonquirksilva.com
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD65
https://www.facebook.com/AssemblywomanSharonQuirkSilva
Toni Atkins (San Deigo)
1350 Front St., Room 6054, San Diego, CA 92101
Tel: (619) 645-3090 Fax: (619) 645-3094
Email: a*******************[email protected] & toniatkinsforassembly2012@
gmail.com
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD78
https://www.facebook.com/SDToni
https://www.facebook.com/toni.atkins.52
下面是请愿文章的范例, 电子邮件标题要清楚简洁表达文章内容, 例如Please vote "
NO" on SCA-5!, 发文章时称呼对方用First Name就可以, 写自己的名字的时候最好是
First Name+Last Name, 这样看起来比较正式有力.
Dear XXX,
I urge you to take immediate steps against SCA-5. SCA-5 is schemed to change
the California educational system. SCA-5 will eliminate the right to be
protected against all kinds of discrimination in education. Making things
even worse is the fact that SCA-5 is merely the first step towards a
terrible path. SCA-5 would result in mandated discrimination against certain
students applying to UC campuses.
From a purely practical standpoint, a policy of rejecting high-performing
students based on their ethnicity is a self-defeating idea. It goes against
everything our supposedly enlightened state stands for. Fairness is a key
principle upon which our educational system should be based. When students
work hard so they can get into a good school, they should have equal
opportunity at admission regardless of ethnicity or gender. SCA-5 will
undermine this basic principle of fairness.
In addition, according to numerous studies, minority students might feel
stigmatized by affirmative action, believing they were admitted on the basis
of their group status, not individual achievement or ability. These
students often consider themselves second-class students, and feel other
students see them in the same light. They are more likely to fail in school
and drop out. Many of our K-12 schools are failing our students, leaving
them unprepared for college. No student should suffer a huge fall in life
because the school the government has chosen for them is not a good fit.
Everyone loses when students drop out.
I hope that our legislators will have courage to reject SCA-5. You will win
my vote if you vote no to SAC-5. Otherwise I will vote against Democrats
from now on and will advise all friends and family to do the same.
Cordially yours,
XXX
Dear XXX,
I sincerely urge you to vote against SCA-5. President Obama said recently “
Billions of people in India and China are striving hard to out-educate
Americans in mathematics and technology. And every year brings more research
showing them pulling ahead. We live in a 21st century global economy. And
in a global economy, jobs can go anywhere." The United States is facing
unprecedented economic and intellectual competition from countries around
the world. This competition will not be decided on the basis of product
price and assortment but in our classrooms and universities. Technology is
shaping the future of the United States and changing our world dramatically.
According to American Civil Rights Coalition, "In the 17 years Prop 209 has
been in effect, California has led the way towards color-blind government
and increased graduation rates in higher education by using race and gender
neutral policies." Prop 209 results in a significant increase in graduation
rates in higher education. This is exactly what California needs to do.
Qualified college graduates ensure an educated workforce for tomorrow's
economy. If we grant preferential treatment based on race in college
admission, history tells us that fewer students will graduate from colleges.
Employers will not be able to find workers with the qualified skills to
fill an increasingly technical job market. This will affect the quality of
the workforce and the state's economic health. Companies will have to spend
more hire skilled workers, potentially from foreign countries, invest more
heavily in workforce development or even outsource jobs overseas. Therefore
SCA-5 is not in America's best interest.
I, therefore, am writing to urge you to vote against SCA-5. SCA-5 will hurt
our economy in the long run. Everyone in California will suffer from short-
sighted policy-making which holds back our growth. If Democrats pass SCA-5
in the Assembly, I'm sure a lot of people who have knowledge will be
enormously upset.
Yours truly,
XXX
Dear XXX,
I write today to urge you to take immediate action against SCA-5. No one has
the right to discriminate against any individuals based on their race. Just
as Abraham Lincoln declared in his Gettysburg Address, years ago our
fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in liberty,
and dedicated to the proposition that “all men are created equal.”
You cannot change facts simply by repeating a lie over and over again. The
color of someone’s skin doesn’t tell you anything about the traits that
qualify them for college. The color of someone’s skin also does not tell
you anything about that individual’s socioeconomic background. Students
from impoverished backgrounds need special consideration to succeed, no
matter their race.
Say no to racism! Say no to SCA-5. Fight for what generations before us have
fought for. SCA-5 is wrapped up in a claim of racial equality and diversity
, but it is pure evil and a fundamental violation of what true racial
equality means. If Democrats pass SCA-5 in the Assembly, tons of people in
California who have morals will hold this against the entire Democrat Party.
Everyone in our community take this matter seriously.
Sincerely yours,
XXX
Dear XXX,
I strongly urge you to vote NO on SCA-5. Martin Luther King Jr. passed away
46 years ago. What happened to "I have a dream that my four little children
will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of
their skin but by the content of their character."? Judging students by
their skin colors is itself inherently discriminatory. We are living
individuals! We represent only ourselves. No one is over represented here.
We got admitted into universities after working our asses off for years. No
one has the right to discriminate against any individuals based on their
race. The only way to create a society with true racial equality is to stop
considering race in the admission process.
Science and higher education should be "color-blind". Decisions based on
race are not the road to prosperity, equality, or stronger feelings of self
esteem in individuals. Selections based on one's color, not one's
achievements and skills, is only working to separate our society further. It
is ill-advised to set different standards for students based on the color
of their skin. Separating kids only makes them feel inferior and that should
’nt be acceptable to anyone. We ought not say that for some ethnic students
the goal is below some other ethnic students.
Therefore I'm asking you to vote NO on SCA5! Otherwise, I think the Democrat
Party has gone over the edge and need to be voted out. Who will demand
equality and justice for all? We are a nation that was built upon the very
principles that all men, and I emphasize all are created equal. Everyone in
our community will pay particular attention to this matter.
Yours Faithfully,
XXX
Dear XXX,
Please vote No on SCA-5. What the SCA-5 acutually does is sheer idiocy and
doesn't make the slightest bit of sense. It's amazing that we still judge
people by their race. Is this really how we want to educate our future
generations? Is there ever going to be an end to racism?
It is in fact a no win situation. Children go to schools and have their GPAs
raised due to race. They later go to colleges based on fictitious GPAs.
Unfortunately professors won't be on board with this plan. Most likely they
won't be able to keep up, rank toward the bottom of the class, and quit or
drop out from schools. What a disaster it would be? This is the problem that
we call "mismatch". It is a problem verified by research.
Say No to SCA-5! Preferential treatment based on race in college admission
is not the right practice. California should not enrolled students based on
race rather than qualifications. Lawmakers need to work on bills which
applies to everyone regardless of their race for improvements in the quality
of education for poor communities or for closing the gap where students
have underachieved.
Yours truly,
XXX
Dear XXX,
I strongly urge you to vote NO on SCA-5. This bill against our
constitutional belief that all men are created equal. In addition it against
the "American Dream". That dream of a land in which life should be better
and richer and fuller for everyone, with opportunity for each according to
ability or achievement.
The fundamental flaw in SCA-5 is racial preferences in college admissions
harm their intended beneficiaries. We refer to this problem as "mismatch".
It is a problem documented by a vast and growing array of research. It will
place students in environments where they can neither learn nor compete
effectively. As a result, students quit or drop out from schools. These same
students would thrive had they gone to less competitive schools. As such
racial preferences lead to devastated outcomes.
In addition, having underprepared students entering colleges would greatly
diminish the quality of education. This is a lose-lose scenario. No one
should be allowed to damage our elite University of California system. Once
it is damaged it is really difficult to rebuild. Going to college is a
privilege, not a right. You would have to work hard to earn a spot.
Therefore I'm asking you to vote NO on SCA5! It is the right thing to do.
Preferential treatment based on race in college admission is not the right
practice. The state shall not discriminate against, or grant preferential
treatment on the basis of race.
Yours truly,
XXX
Dear XXX,
I hereby urge you to vote NO to SCA-5! As SCA-5 will roll back the clock to
the days when students were discriminated against based on their race. SCA-5
hide under the disguise of equal opportunity. However SCA-5 is in fact the
antithesis of equal opportunity as it demands equal outcomes. But true
equity demands fair outcomes for all. The injustice of disparities in any
population is when equity is diminished. It is communism in essence since
resources are to be divided equally. It will destroy the incentive to excel
and compete and drag down U.S. competitiveness in the long run.
Lawmakers need to work on bills which applies to everyone regardless of
their race for improvements in the quality of education for poor communities
or for closing the gap where students have underachieved. What messages are
we sending to our children that they should be treated differently because
of their race, instead of their efforts and qualifications?
Therefore I strongly urge you to fight against SCA-5. I have a dream, do you
? Everyone in our community will pay close attention to this matter.
Thank you,
XXX
Dear XXX:
Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. This bill is to include race as a factor to
provide preference in college admissions. I firmly believe that this is
against the fundamental principles of U.S. law and the American legal system
. All men are equal regardless of race.
Therefore, I strongly urge you to vote NO on this matter. Your vote is very
important to everyone in our community.
Thank you,
XXX
Dear XXX,
Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. SCA-5 proposed using race as a factor in college
admissions. I urge you to fight against SCA-5. Just as Martin Luther King,
Jr. said 41 years ago, no children should be judged by the color of their
skin, but by the content of their character. Your child(ren) deserve this
dream. Every American child deserves this dream. Don't you agree? It is
about right or wrong. This is where the difference comes between a
politician and a statesman/woman.
It's your choice which side you're on. I have a dream, do you? The people
who shares the same dream as Martin Luther King, Jr. will remember your
choice. They will decide who they vote for, who they send money to, and who
they canvass for.
Best regards,
XXX
Dear XXX,
Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. It is pure racism! My kids future is as important
as anyone's kids. Why two individuals at the same level of education might
differ in their college admissions? What century do we live in? This is
supposedly a country that believes in equality.
I strongly urge you to fight against SCA-5. Otherwise, no more votes and
donations from me and all my relatives and friends for you or any Democrats.
Everyone in our community will pay close attention to this issue.
Respectfully,
XXX
Dear XXX,
Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. Objection to any law that allow any
discrimination against, or granting preferential treatment to, any
individual or group on the basis of race in the operation of public
education. Racial discrimination is wrong, whichever way it goes, in
whatever name. If diversity is the point of preferences, why only in college
admissions? Why not in the recruitment process of government agencies? in
entertainment, in sports...
I strongly urge you to fight against SCA-5. All men are equal regardless of
race. Otherwise, no more votes and donations from me and all my relatives
and friends for you or any Democrats. Everyone in our community will pay
close attention to this issue.
Best regards,
XXX
Dear XXX,
Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. I am impressed that this clear violation of
constitutional law could even pass the senate! What are senators doing? How
do we explain to our children that what they've been taught on equal
opportunity is no longer true. It has been amended. Martin Luther King, Jr.
said I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a
nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the
content of their character. But it is no longer in accord with reality. Why
don't we amend the employment standards after college admissions? So those
who are entitled to privileges in admission could automatically get
government jobs?
I strongly urge you to fight against SCA-5. All men are equal regardless of
race. Otherwise, no more votes and donations from me and all my relatives
and friends for you or any Democrats. Everyone in our community will pay
close attention to this issue.
Respectfully,
XXX
Dear XXX,
Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. This bill is total racism. What a degradation! It
's a waste of public money for those senators working on this nonsense. The
rational behind the bill is totally ridiculous. We believe in the right of
education for all Californians. California should not enrolled students
based on race rather than qualifications.
I strongly urge you to fight against SCA-5. Otherwise, no more votes and
donations from me and all my relatives and friends for you or any Democrats.
Everyone in our community will pay close attention to this issue.
Sincerely yours,
XXX
Dear XXX,
Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. "I have a dream that my four little children will
one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of
their skin, but by the content of their character."---Martin Luther King, Jr
. Do we helping Martin Luther King's dream(which is my dream too)? Do we
punish hard working students by racial preferences? Is this the right way to
promote better education for California?
I strongly urge you to fight against SCA-5. Otherwise, no more votes and
donations from me and all my relatives and friends for you or any Democrats.
Everyone in our community will pay close attention to this issue.
Yours truly,
XXX
Dear XXX,
Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. The only barrier for student of any colors for
higher education is their work enthusiasm. How about we do the same thing
for the State Assembly? Candidate must collect certain amount of votes (
scores in S.A.T.) to be qualified, then by using qualified candidates’ race
and ethnic background to decide if he/she can become a member of the
California State Assembly. Because "We need to ensure that the State
Assembly reflects our changing population".
I strongly urge you to fight against SCA-5. Students should be admitted
based on merits, not race! Otherwise, no more votes and donations from me
and all my relatives and friends for you or any Democrats. Everyone in our
community will pay close attention to this issue.
Sincerely yours,
XXX
Dear XXX,
Please vote NO on SCA 5 as it is a racist bill. It promotes discrimination
by judging people based on their race. Admission to any school among other
things, should solely based on their own merit and not on their color, race,
and etc. I believe preferential treatment based on race in college
admission is not the right practice. In addition it violates the Equal
Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
I strongly urge you to vote "No" on SCA 5. Students deserve have an equal
opportunity in the college admission process regardless of their race. Thank
you for listening to the voice of your people.
Respectfully,
XXX
Dear XXX,
Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. This is ridiculous and is so wrong! This is a
reverse discrimination. This proposition limits the opportunity of certain
kids to attend the University of California because of their races. Higher
education should be offered to those who can do it.
I strongly urge you to fight against SCA-5. Students deserve have an equal
opportunity in the college admission process regardless of their race. I
always support Democrats. But if Democrats pass SCA-5 in the Assembly, I
will immediately switch my support to Republicans in future elections. Most
people in my community rank education as the most important policy issue.
Best regards,
XXX
最后可以再加上下面这些, 有些文章和一个影像是相当好的.
For more information on this topic, please refer to articles and a video
below.
The Painful Truth About Affirmative Action
http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/10/the-painful
Elder vs. State Senator Ed Hernandez (D-CA) on Racial Preferences, Jan. 31,
2014
http://vimeo.com/86149155
In U.S., Most Reject Considering Race in College Admissions
http://www.gallup.com/poll/163655/reject-considering-race-colle
UC proves Prop. 209's point
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jul/12/opinion/la-oe-lehrer-af
Viewpoints: A step backward on higher education enrollment
http://www.sacbee.com/2014/02/08/6138480/viewpoints-a-step-back
Careful, California voters, your wishes are under attack
http://articles.latimes.com/2014/feb/07/opinion/la-oe-gratz-cal
如果要加文章连结可能要再修整一下, 如果在讨论区用copy & paste有可能贴成不完整
连结, 用nosca5.blogspot.com上的文章就没这个问题, 请注意一下这一点. 要确认一
下是完整的网址.
这里有些反SCA-5的海报, 也可以考虑加在电子邮件中或传真都可以运用.
http://nosca5.blogspot.com/2014/02/sca-5.html
Step 4:
使用下面这个网站邮寄信件给你选区的加州众议员表达意见, 这个网站已经全部帮忙设
定好, 花不到几分钟就可以产生一篇非常完整详细的请愿信.
http://www.no2sca5.org/
http://www.no2sca5.org/#Why-A-Snail-Mail-to-Your-Representative
Step 5:
下面这些是其他加州民主党众议员的联络方式, 我觉得他们改变立场的机率低, 如果要
尝试的话用email再加上facebook的message扫一遍就好了, 应该也花不了太多时间.
Isadore Hall, III
Tel: (310) 223-1201 Fax: (310) 223-1202
Email: a*****************[email protected] & i*****[email protected]
i**[email protected]
http://www.isadorehall.com/ (选Contact Us)
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Isadore-Hall-for-Assembly/209986370129
Chris Holden
Tel: (626) 351-1917 Fax: (626) 351-6176
Email: a*******************[email protected] & i**[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/Assemblymember
Reggie Jones-Sawyer
Tel: (213) 744-2111 Fax: (213) 744-2122
Email: a*************************[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/reggiejonessawyersr
Bonnie Lowenthal
Tel: (562) 495-2915 Fax: (562) 495-2983
Email: a**********************[email protected] & Bonnie@
BonnieforLongBeach.com
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Bonnie-Lowenthal/25127873810
Steve Bradford
Tel: (310) 412-6400 Fax: (310) 412-6354
Email: a*********************[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/stevenbradford62
Cheryl Brown
Tel: (909) 381-3238 Fax: (909) 885-8589
Email: a******************[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/cheryl.brown.988711
Adrin Nazarian
Tel: (818) 376-4246 Fax: (818) 376-4252
Email: a*********************[email protected] & adrinforassembly@gmail.
com
https://www.facebook.com/AdrinNazarian
Bill Quirk
Tel: (510) 583-8818 Fax: (510) 583-8800
Email: a******************[email protected]
http://www.electbillquirk.com/contact
https://www.facebook.com/BillQuirkAD20
Matthew Dababneh
Tel: (818) 904-3840
Email: a*********************[email protected] & m**[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/MattDababnehForAssembly
Tom Daly
Tel: (714) 939-8469 Fax: (714) 939-8986
Email: a*****************[email protected] & [email protected]
Roger Dickinson
(916) 324-4676 Fax: (916) 327-3338
Email: a**********************[email protected] & r***[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/assemblymemberdickinson
Sebastian Ridley-Thomas
Tel: (310) 342-1070 Fax: (310) 342-1078
Email: a**************************[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/SRTforAssembly
Steve Fox
Tel: (661) 267-7636 Fax: (661) 267-7736
Email: a****************[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/pages/I-Support-Steve-Fox-2014/183712445136345
Nancy Skinner
Tel: (510) 286-1400 Fax: (510) 286-1406
Email: a********************[email protected] & c*****[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/asm.nancy.skinner
Jim Frazier
Tel: (707) 399-3011 Fax: (707) 399-3030
Email: a********************[email protected]
http://jimfrazierforassembly.com/contact-jim-frazier/
https://www.facebook.com/ASMJimFrazier
Shirley Weber
Tel: (619) 531-7913 Fax: (619) 531-7924
Email: a******************[email protected] & i**[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/ShirleyWeberCalliforniaStateAssembly
Adam Gray
Tel: (209) 726-5465 Fax: (209) 726-5469
Email: a*****************[email protected] & a**[email protected]
http://www.adamgrayforassembly.com/contact-us
https://www.facebook.com/AdamGrayForAssembly
Susan Bonilla
Tel: (925) 521-1511 Fax: (925) 602-1536
Email: a********************[email protected] & s***[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/JoinSusanBonilla
Luis Alejo
(831) 759-8676 Fax: (831) 759-2961
Email: a******************[email protected] & V***********[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/lalejo
Raul Bocanegra
Tel: (818) 504-3911 Fax: (818) 504-3912
Email: a**********************[email protected] & r**[email protected]
c*****[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/RaulJBocanegra
Ian Calderon
Tel: (562) 692-5858 Fax: (562) 695-5852
Email: a*********************[email protected]
http://ianccalderon.com/#contact
https://www.facebook.com/AssemblymemberIanCalderon
Nora Campos
Tel: (408) 277-1220 Fax: (408) 277-1036
Email: a*******************[email protected]
Susan Eggman
Tel: (209) 948-7479 Fax: (209) 465-5058
Email: a*******************[email protected] & i**[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/susan.eggman
Cristina Garcia
Tel: (562) 861-5803 Fax: (562) 861-5158
Email: a*******************[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/cristinagarciaad58
Jimmy Gomez
Tel: (213) 483-5151 Fax: (213) 483-5166
Email: a******************[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/assemblymemberjimmygomez
Lorena Gonzalez
Tel: 619-338-8090 Fax: 619-338-8099
Email: a*********************[email protected] & V********[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Lorena-Gonzalez-for-State-Assembly/
398973036849751
Roger Hernandez
Tel: (626) 960-4457 Fax: (626) 960-1310
Email: a**********************[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/Vote.Roger.Hernandez
Jose Medina
Tel: (951) 369-6644 Fax: (951) 369-0366
Email: a*******************[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/AsmJoseMedina
Henry Perea
Tel: (559) 445-5532 Fax: (559) 445-6006
Email: a******************[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/AssemblymemberPerea
John A. Pérez
Tel: (213) 620-4646 Fax: (213) 620-6319
Email: A***********************[email protected] & HQ@perezforcontroller.
com
https://www.facebook.com/SpeakerPerez
V. Manuel Perez
Tel: (760) 342-8047 Fax: (760) 347-8704
Email: A*************************[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/pages/V-Manuel-Perez-CA-State-Assemblymember/
382172440154
Anthony Rendon
Tel: (562) 529-3250 Fax: (562) 529-3255
Email: a*******************[email protected] & assemblyman.arendon@gmail.
com
https://www.facebook.com/AssemblyMemberAnthonyRendon
https://www.facebook.com/anthonyrendonforassembly
Freddie Rodriguez
Email: a**********************[email protected] & e**********[email protected]
r*****[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Freddie-Rodriguez-for-Assembly/
519771921405293
Rudy Salas
Email: A******************[email protected] & i**[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/rudysalas
https://www.facebook.com/rudysalasjr
下面这个人是SCA-5提案人, 请大家让他知道种族歧视是不好的, 不要再继续提出这样
的法案.
Ed Hernandez
Phone: (626) 430-2499 Fax: (916) 651-4924
Email: s***************[email protected]
http://www.edhernandez4senate.com/ (选Contact)
https://www.facebook.com/DrEdHernandez

a****r
发帖数: 4965

华人不是钱多人傻，是钱多人少。俗话说，人多力量大，人少的一方容易成为被欺负的
对象。
等到黑人+西裔超过50%的时候，就算全体华人联合起来反对，也无济于事了。
总之，华人要团结，但更要多生孩子，改变人口比例。

【在 r*********e 的大作中提到】

a******a
发帖数: 281

Can't agree more........

老中要是能团结，不贪财，利比里亚早成第二美国了。可怜之人必有可恨之处，都是娘
胎里带来的品性。大伙还是洗洗睡了吧。

【在 a***r 的大作中提到】

: 老中要是能团结，不贪财，利比里亚早成第二美国了。可怜之人必有可恨之处，都是娘
: 胎里带来的品性。大伙还是洗洗睡了吧。

z****e
发帖数: 54598

说得不错

k*z
发帖数: 4704

我觉得楼主说的很有道理，我们就应该鼓励非法移民的老中，
偷渡的，庇护的，结婚的，外F的，只要能增加人口比例，大批量空投都没问题。
另外老中应该鼓励生育，人口比例是王道，打仗也是要人的。

z*****a
发帖数: 9790

还嫌吃福利的华人不够多，要给猪党义务增加票仓？别忘了，跟黑墨站在一起的正是这
类人，别一厢情愿了。

【在 k*z 的大作中提到】

: 我觉得楼主说的很有道理，我们就应该鼓励非法移民的老中，
: 偷渡的，庇护的，结婚的，外F的，只要能增加人口比例，大批量空投都没问题。
: 另外老中应该鼓励生育，人口比例是王道，打仗也是要人的。

s********s
发帖数: 4011

你们这理解能力真是捉急...
lz话不一定都有理，但是老中得抱团得互相支持帮助以争取政治利益是没说错的

【在 h*******e 的大作中提到】

: 感觉是有人在鱼翅事件上利益受损，所以这次来浑水摸鱼。

g******l
发帖数: 5103

小农意识，鲁迅100年前就看出来了
自私、小心眼，总想高人一等，否则心里就不舒服
小事一个劲算计，生怕吃一点亏，大事上傻逼
其实就是自找的

相关主题
● 反对SCA5，找个人，不用族裔数据 (转载)	● SCA-5不死，我们华裔死
● 反对SCA-5具体有效的步骤, 请转发	● 老中都错了，SCA5的问题根本就不是造成不公平竞争！！！ (转载)
● 请大家拿出行动，尽点义务：加州AB1726法案下一步将移交health committee	● 中国城移民更应该支持床铺
进入USANews版参与讨论

x****o
发帖数: 29677

把鱼翅禁了，断了人家老广餐馆，运输，贩卖的生计，现在要人家跟着一起投票，请问
现实么？
当初禁止鱼翅我就说了，华人应该团结起来一起反对。结果不少人说什么陋习就该禁
三十年河东，三十年河西，现在怎么样？请问这些人想团结华人，早干什么去了，事到
临头要人家团结，损人不利己时却无所谓，你觉得有多少人是这么大无私？

【在 y***i 的大作中提到】

: 支持禁鱼翅就不能团结反对SAC5了？谁啊站出来让我看个新鲜。。。。这思维方式也
: 太帅了吧。。。。

x****o
发帖数: 29677

说一说，死不了人，让老中们都清醒下，下次有什么不利的，要一起反对，我也签名反
对SCA５，不过我觉得那个签名用处不大

【在 n****g 的大作中提到】

: 不能这样说。

x****o
发帖数: 29677

我自己从来不吃鱼翅，但是当初禁止鱼翅时我就说过，华人利益受损了，就应该一起反
对，禁止鱼翅一般人没什么，但是很多老华侨，老广移民，餐馆老板，运输贩卖，都靠
鱼翅，这么搞掉了一批老移民的利益受损，而其他老中却在拍手叫好，为融入主流而欢
呼，请问换回来了什么？
现在，需要华人团结投票，又要拉拢那些老华侨，老广移民，请问你觉得这么做事，以
后华人能长久团结么？

【在 h*******e 的大作中提到】

: 感觉是有人在鱼翅事件上利益受损，所以这次来浑水摸鱼。

n****g
发帖数: 14743

鱼翅算神马啊!
华人团结不起来,是因为没有信仰.

【在 x****o 的大作中提到】

:
: 我自己从来不吃鱼翅，但是当初禁止鱼翅时我就说过，华人利益受损了，就应该一起反
: 对，禁止鱼翅一般人没什么，但是很多老华侨，老广移民，餐馆老板，运输贩卖，都靠
: 鱼翅，这么搞掉了一批老移民的利益受损，而其他老中却在拍手叫好，为融入主流而欢
: 呼，请问换回来了什么？
: 现在，需要华人团结投票，又要拉拢那些老华侨，老广移民，请问你觉得这么做事，以
: 后华人能长久团结么？

z*****a
发帖数: 9790

你这也是纯搞笑。如果我没记错，当初提出禁鱼翅的也是民主党议员，老移民在这个事
情上利益受损，不怨恨民主党议员怨恨谁？跟这次反对同样是民主党议员的sca5有什么
冲突的？
除非你觉得老移民都是傻子，连这个道理都想不通。

【在 x****o 的大作中提到】

x****o
发帖数: 29677

干脆都信也素好了，教会的势力倒是挺大的

【在 n****g 的大作中提到】

: 鱼翅算神马啊!
: 华人团结不起来,是因为没有信仰.

n****g
发帖数: 14743

信仰也不一定都是信教

【在 x****o 的大作中提到】

:
: 干脆都信也素好了，教会的势力倒是挺大的

t**l
发帖数: 577

我是加州老中，从来是共和党的范儿，周围老中的朋友谈起来也基本都是对民主党不感
冒。我一直没觉得中国人会选民主党，你这么多的加州老中支持民主党是从哪里听说来
的还是瞎猜的？？
老中的问题不是选谁，而是根本不关心选票而且能选的不参选。这个跟加州不加州没有
关系。

【在 x****o 的大作中提到】

p******o
发帖数: 9007

现在说风凉话的嘴都比较贱。

【在 x****o 的大作中提到】

j****9
发帖数: 243

我觉得吧，任何时候华人的利益受损都不要说风凉话，应该鼓励影响为主，一起抱团取
暖才好，不然各自击破，大家都被当包子捏。
中国人的确从政意愿不强，尤其好容易来了美国，英语又不是母语，做很多事情受限，
都想先站稳脚跟，安安静静过日子，政治还来不及关心，不过慢慢会好的，这可能需要
几代人的努力。
但是最重要的，首先自己不要歧视自己！如果中国人自己都歧视中国人，那怎么可能指
望别的族裔来尊重你？对吧

相关主题
● 对这几天的骚乱做的感概	● 包子贴
● 议员Carol Liu在脸书上有关SCA5的回答是这样的	● 一人一票的民主2.0版本已经快要崩溃了 (转载)
● 罪魁赫南德兹：限制亚裔入学提案(SCA5) 不会撤销也不会停止	● 加州的亚裔AA态度调查
进入USANews版参与讨论

A*****a
发帖数: 52743

加州华人需要懂得抱团取暖，所以风凉话难听但有意义

★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 8.6

【在 j****9 的大作中提到】

: 我觉得吧，任何时候华人的利益受损都不要说风凉话，应该鼓励影响为主，一起抱团取
: 暖才好，不然各自击破，大家都被当包子捏。
: 中国人的确从政意愿不强，尤其好容易来了美国，英语又不是母语，做很多事情受限，
: 都想先站稳脚跟，安安静静过日子，政治还来不及关心，不过慢慢会好的，这可能需要
: 几代人的努力。
: 但是最重要的，首先自己不要歧视自己！如果中国人自己都歧视中国人，那怎么可能指
: 望别的族裔来尊重你？对吧

z*****a
发帖数: 9790

同意抱团，但是要看往哪里报，如果往主党那里抱，我放弃抱团。

【在 A*****a 的大作中提到】

: 加州华人需要懂得抱团取暖，所以风凉话难听但有意义
:
: ★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 8.6

h*******g
发帖数: 2201

【在 T*********I 的大作中提到】

: 老中应该
: 1. 多关心政治，
: 2. 学习安全使用枪械知识。
: 3. 拿掉民主党的多数。选共和党

X*******8
发帖数: 3895

SCA对老中有那么重要么？其他州包括私校不是明的暗的在实行AA吗？你看哈佛，如果
就按他们自己的标准，按能力学业录取，不早就被老中占了？老中学业好，进不了哈佛
，绝大多数也能进其他私校。谁稀罕那个公立学校？如果你的孩子进不了私校，要靠公
立才能上学的话，说明不行啊。那反正是公立，上个社区的也可以吗。我觉的单加州反
没用，要全体华人一起戮力，因为美国事实上在所有地方实行AA.

c****a
发帖数: 3173

加州的估计是偷渡的，香港人和台湾人居多吧。他们选mzd的居多。不一定是来自大陆
的正规渠道移民过来的。

s*********s
发帖数: 1303

我在加州，同意你骂的除第一条以外的。所以老中们要觉醒，这是机会

【在 x****o 的大作中提到】

a***r
发帖数: 2677

我说大伙不要有幻想了，要想政治上有影响力，一是靠人多，二是靠肯花钱。就老中那
个抠门的劲，多给2快小费都满版的吵。看看有人给加州共和党的那个人捐钱么？都等
事情急了才跳脚，除了在中文版上喊喊，就会发几封信，被人转手扔垃圾箱的东西，管
用么？就等着被印墨统治吧，也没啥，满清也统治了我们两百年，我们还是可以考科举
吗，现在也一样，只要你CODE刷的好，总有老印经理聘你进FLG不是。老中就这个命，
还想转性翻天是不可能的。

c********l
发帖数: 3254

鱼翅是该禁的，民主党是不该支持的。

G***o
发帖数: 5158

说得基本在理。华裔作为一个成分低微的族裔，不能再分裂了。内部有不同意见，也应
求同存异，行动起来一个步调。

【在 x****o 的大作中提到】

d**********r
发帖数: 24123

哈哈，支持一个。说得好。
纽约也有不少这样自贱的华人

(共1页)

进入USANews版参与讨论

相关主题
● 美国的命运注定是...	● 反对SCA-5具体有效的步骤, 请转发
● 川粉需要想想看	● 请大家拿出行动，尽点义务：加州AB1726法案下一步将移交health committee
● 右派不要以为排华法案不会再次发生	● SCA-5不死，我们华裔死
● 华人真是小聪明大愚蠢，政治正确这事就能看出 (转载)	● 老中都错了，SCA5的问题根本就不是造成不公平竞争！！！ (转载)
● 加州SCA 5其实是华人咎由自取	● 中国城移民更应该支持床铺
● SCA5法案上面，大陆中国人的吃相简直太难看了 (转载)	● 对这几天的骚乱做的感概
● 为什么在这种情况下，我仍然不支持共和党	● 议员Carol Liu在脸书上有关SCA5的回答是这样的
● 反对SCA5，找个人，不用族裔数据 (转载)	● 罪魁赫南德兹：限制亚裔入学提案(SCA5) 不会撤销也不会停止

相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: email话题: fax话题: tel话题: 老中话题: 加州

#	版面	帖数(主题数)
-	全站	4871 (796)
1	Military	3777 (569)
2	Stock	341 (51)
3	Joke	117 (17)
4	History	116 (3)
5	Automobile	100 (9)
6	USANews	55 (9)
7	Midlife	45 (1)
8	Headline	41 (41)
9	Dreamer	33 (13)
10	FleaMarket	32 (20)
11	Living	30 (7)

boards

未名新帖统计// 7月16日

历史上的今天