由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - “The real action is in the enemy’s reaction”
相关主题
Florida拉美选民早期投票增加一倍one piece of experience to educate leftist
Why Do Democrats Oppose Voter ID?万人大合唱 "CNN Sucks"
History of American FirstTrump赢了,政治不正确NYU教授没事了
DHS ends protected status for 59,000 HaitiansCrowd chanted "CNN Sucks" at Trump's Phoenix Rally
左派的确是大爱无疆,不服不行啊The Real Reason They Hate Trump
波多黎各遭灾民主党赚大了翻译家英文好,来翻译一下事实真相,CNN发的哦
Jamie Glazov:为什么左派为本-拉登的死亡哭泣Angela Davis calls Obama a Black Radical
How the Dual Income Destroys the Lower ClassesTop Democrat:鼓励穆斯林揭发身边有极端倾向的人
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: news话题: love话题: chalain话题: mia话题: democratic
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
l****z
发帖数: 29846
1
August 30, 2012
So wrote Saul D. Alinsky in his landmark (and final) work, Rules for
Radicals.
During Tuesday night’s mainstream media coverage of the Republican National
Convention, the “impartial” veneer of the Leftist/Democrat/Media complex
completely disappeared, giving viewers a rare insight into the crude,
bigoted, and insensitive nature of their behind-closed-doors attitudes about
minorities who are part of the Republican party.
During key speeches by former Democratic Rep. Artur Davis, Mia Love, a black
candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives from Utah, and Texas
senatorial hopeful Ted Cruz, MSNBC deliberately chose to cut away from the
convention podium and instead entertain their viewers with talking-head
commentary. And on the NBC News page, none of the video from these speakers
is available.
After Mia Love’s speech, leftist cyberstalkers hacked her Wikipedia entry,
embellishing her bio by describing her as “a total sellout to the Right
Wing Hate Machine and the greedy bigots who control the GOP and love to see
people like Mia Love be exploited like the House Nigger she truly is.”
Liberals in the Twitterverse wasted no time labeling her an “Aunt Tom,” a
“traitor,” and *horrors* a Haitian.
Harper’s magazine tried to stir the pot by erroneously reporting that
delegates started chanting “USA! USA” during a short speech by Puerto
Rican Zoraida Fonalledas, the chairwoman of the Committee on Permanent
Organization, presumably in response to her heavy Spanish accent. Harper’s
later published an editor’s note clarifying the incident and explaining
that the chanting and disorderly conduct had begun earlier as part of a
response to the Ron Paul delegation from Massachusetts, and had nothing to
do with Fonalledas.
And as Doug Johnson previously reported, an open mic at an ABC News live
feed from the convention picked up an offhand comment by David Chalian, the
Yahoo News DC Bureau Chief, who suggested that Republicans were completely
unconcerned with Hurricane Isaac, and “are happy to have a party with black
people drowning.” Chalain was fired by Yahoo News for his comment.
As Roger Simon correctly observes, these aren’t accidental occurrences.
They are the result of a culture that fosters bigotry and hate under the
guise of exposing the assumed bigotry and hate of others. In response to
Chalain’s quip, Simon asks, “Why would anyone dream of saying such a thing
in a semi-public situation if he didn’t feel safe and among friends?”
The fact that a few people in the room chuckled after Chalain’s remark
seems to fortify this assumption with alarming seriousness.
Four years ago, the mainstream media erased any perceptions of objectivity
by ruthlessly attacking Sarah Palin while simultaneously whitewashing
anything in Barack Obama’s past that might prove to be controversial, and
deliberately spiking any reporting on the John Edwards/Rielle Hunter affair
until after Edwards was safely out of the running for the Democrat
nomination. And then there was Ezra Klein’s JournoList, a a Google Groups
forum where Democratic party strategists and left-leaning journalists could
openly discuss tactics for promoting the Democratic party agenda in their
reporting.
Is this what happens when intellectual laziness overtakes a peer group, and
name-calling takes the place of honest reporting or an open-minded
discussion of differences in policy objectives? I certainly believe so.
And the fascinating thing is, no one is trying to trap journalists or strong
-arm them into saying foolish things or covering up facts that don’t fit
the Leftist narrative. They are doing it themselves, voluntarily. They own
it. They built it. And no amount of ‘shared responsibility’ rhetoric is
going to get them off the hook this time.
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
Top Democrat:鼓励穆斯林揭发身边有极端倾向的人左派的确是大爱无疆,不服不行啊
obama为啥把nobel prize award奖给学校?波多黎各遭灾民主党赚大了
CBS:62%美国人希望共和党继续挑战民主党控制的国会刚刚通过的医疗法案Jamie Glazov:为什么左派为本-拉登的死亡哭泣
WE WON! OSCAR LOPEZ PAROLE DENIED!How the Dual Income Destroys the Lower Classes
Florida拉美选民早期投票增加一倍one piece of experience to educate leftist
Why Do Democrats Oppose Voter ID?万人大合唱 "CNN Sucks"
History of American FirstTrump赢了,政治不正确NYU教授没事了
DHS ends protected status for 59,000 HaitiansCrowd chanted "CNN Sucks" at Trump's Phoenix Rally
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: news话题: love话题: chalain话题: mia话题: democratic