d********f
发帖数: 43471 | 1 作为一个屁民的一点想法给各位参考一下。我根本不想争论民猪党政治理念的对错，我
只一个标准来判断那就是一个政党是不是会限制屁民我的言论思想自由。民猪党控制了
大部分舆论喉舌，控制教育系统，给你们的下一代进行洗脑，你不能发表任何他们认为
政治不正确的言论。不用说屁民了，堂堂nobel奖获得者，生物锁男的祖师发表iq和
race的研究结果都能立刻丢了工作。相比之下，共和党还愿意和你讨论一下进化论，你
挑战圣经在大部分州肯定不会被赶出教室。所以相比之下，我觉得在两陀大便之间，我
愿意选择更能compromise的共和党。
同理，roc999作为版主，把自己弄成这个版的焦点，一言不合就封人杀档，这个就走了
民猪党路线了 | wy
发帖数: 14511 | 2 八卦一下生物锁男的祖师的故事？
【在 d********f 的大作中提到】
: 作为一个屁民的一点想法给各位参考一下。我根本不想争论民猪党政治理念的对错，我
: 只一个标准来判断那就是一个政党是不是会限制屁民我的言论思想自由。民猪党控制了
: 大部分舆论喉舌，控制教育系统，给你们的下一代进行洗脑，你不能发表任何他们认为
: 政治不正确的言论。不用说屁民了，堂堂nobel奖获得者，生物锁男的祖师发表iq和
: race的研究结果都能立刻丢了工作。相比之下，共和党还愿意和你讨论一下进化论，你
: 挑战圣经在大部分州肯定不会被赶出教室。所以相比之下，我觉得在两陀大便之间，我
: 愿意选择更能compromise的共和党。
: 同理，roc999作为版主，把自己弄成这个版的焦点，一言不合就封人杀档，这个就走了
: 民猪党路线了
| c*****g
发帖数: 3871 | | l*****6
发帖数: 446 | 4 看看支持民猪党大部分都是黑墨，就知道支持它们美国今后会怎样了！ | b*******e
发帖数: 4483 | 5 民主党和ROC999有啥关系？
【在 d********f 的大作中提到】
: 作为一个屁民的一点想法给各位参考一下。我根本不想争论民猪党政治理念的对错，我
: 只一个标准来判断那就是一个政党是不是会限制屁民我的言论思想自由。民猪党控制了
: 大部分舆论喉舌，控制教育系统，给你们的下一代进行洗脑，你不能发表任何他们认为
: 政治不正确的言论。不用说屁民了，堂堂nobel奖获得者，生物锁男的祖师发表iq和
: race的研究结果都能立刻丢了工作。相比之下，共和党还愿意和你讨论一下进化论，你
: 挑战圣经在大部分州肯定不会被赶出教室。所以相比之下，我觉得在两陀大便之间，我
: 愿意选择更能compromise的共和党。
: 同理，roc999作为版主，把自己弄成这个版的焦点，一言不合就封人杀档，这个就走了
: 民猪党路线了
| d********f
发帖数: 43471 | 6 One of the world's most eminent scientists was embroiled in an extraordinary
row last night after he claimed that black people were less intelligent
than white people and the idea that "equal powers of reason" were shared
across racial groups was a delusion.
James Watson, a Nobel Prize winner for his part in the unravelling of DNA
who now runs one of America's leading scientific research institutions, drew
widespread condemnation for comments he made ahead of his arrival in
Britain today for a speaking tour at venues including the Science Museum in
London.
The 79-year-old geneticist reopened the explosive debate about race and
science in a newspaper interview in which he said Western policies towards
African countries were wrongly based on an assumption that black people were
as clever as their white counterparts when "testing" suggested the contrary
. He claimed genes responsible for creating differences in human
intelligence could be found within a decade.
The newly formed Equality and Human Rights Commission, successor to the
Commission for Racial Equality, said it was studying Dr Watson's remarks "in
full". Dr Watson told The Sunday Times that he was "inherently gloomy about
the prospect of Africa" because "all our social policies are based on the
fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing
says not really". He said there was a natural desire that all human beings
should be equal but "people who have to deal with black employees find this
not true".
His views are also reflected in a book published next week, in which he
writes: "There is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual
capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should
prove to have evolved identically. Our wanting to reserve equal powers of
reason as some universal heritage of humanity will not be enough to make it
so."
The furore echoes the controversy created in the 1990s by The Bell Curve, a
book co-authored by the American political scientist Charles Murray, which
suggested differences in IQ were genetic and discussed the implications of a
racial divide in intelligence. The work was heavily criticised across the
world, in particular by leading scientists who described it as a work of "
scientific racism".
Dr Watson arrives in Britain today for a speaking tour to publicise his
latest book, Avoid Boring People: Lessons from a Life in Science. Among his
first engagements is a speech to an audience at the Science Museum organised
by the Dana Centre, which held a discussion last night on the history of
scientific racism.
Critics of Dr Watson said there should be a robust response to his views
across the spheres of politics and science. Keith Vaz, the Labour chairman
of the Home Affairs Select Committee, said: "It is sad to see a scientist of
such achievement making such baseless, unscientific and extremely offensive
comments. I am sure the scientific community will roundly reject what
appear to be Dr Watson's personal prejudices.
"These comments serve as a reminder of the attitudes which can still exists
at the highest professional levels."
The American scientist earned a place in the history of great scientific
breakthroughs of the 20th century when he worked at the University of
Cambridge in the 1950s and 1960s and formed part of the team which
discovered the structure of DNA. He shared the 1962 Nobel Prize for medicine
with his British colleague Francis Crick and New Zealand-born Maurice
Wilkins.
But despite serving for 50 years as a director of the Cold Spring Harbor
Laboratory on Long Island, considered a world leader in research into cancer
and genetics, Dr Watson has frequently courted controversy with some of his
views on politics, sexuality and race. The respected journal Science wrote
in 1990: "To many in the scientific community, Watson has long been
something of a wild man, and his colleagues tend to hold their collective
breath whenever he veers from the script."
In 1997, he told a British newspaper that a woman should have the right to
abort her unborn child if tests could determine it would be homosexual. He
later insisted he was talking about a "hypothetical" choice which could
never be applied. He has also suggested a link between skin colour and sex
drive, positing the theory that black people have higher libidos, and argued
in favour of genetic screening and engineering on the basis that "stupidity
" could one day be cured. He has claimed that beauty could be genetically
manufactured, saying: "People say it would be terrible if we made all girls
pretty. I think it would great."
The Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory said yesterday that Dr Watson could not be
contacted to comment on his remarks.
Steven Rose, a professor of biological sciences at the Open University and a
founder member of the Society for Social Responsibility in Science, said: "
This is Watson at his most scandalous. He has said similar things about
women before but I have never heard him get into this racist terrain. If he
knew the literature in the subject he would know he was out of his depth
scientifically, quite apart from socially and politically."
Anti-racism campaigners called for Dr Watson's remarks to be looked at in
the context of racial hatred laws. A spokesman for the 1990 Trust, a black
human rights group, said: "It is astonishing that a man of such distinction
should make comments that seem to perpetuate racism in this way. It amounts
to fuelling bigotry and we would like it to be looked at for grounds of
legal complaint."
【在 wy 的大作中提到】
: 八卦一下生物锁男的祖师的故事？
| d**********3
发帖数: 1186 | | v*****s
发帖数: 20290 | 8 博导的帖子总共就一段啊……
【在 c*****g 的大作中提到】
: 完全同意第一段；
: 第二段需要商榷。
| c*****g
发帖数: 3871 | 9 "同理，roc999作为版主，把自己弄成这个版的焦点，一言不合就封人杀档，这个就走了
民猪党路线了"
【在 v*****s 的大作中提到】
: 博导的帖子总共就一段啊……
| m***o
发帖数: 55 | 10 这就是狭隘的双重标准， 智商和Race不行， 田径可以。 | r********9
发帖数: 18394 | | k*****n
发帖数: 9823 | 12 是啊，完全就是这个论调。
谁让在美国种族问题就是禁区呢？
人和人生来平等，说的更多政治层面的，而不是生理方面的。正因为人和人的不同，我
们才有如此多样化的世界
【在 m***o 的大作中提到】
: 这就是狭隘的双重标准， 智商和Race不行， 田径可以。
|
|
