N*L
发帖数: 899 | 1 http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/fiscal-cliff-deal-r
Fiscal Cliff Deal Redefines What It Means to Be “Rich”
To listen to the moaning of some Republicans in the House of Representatives
, you could be forgiven for thinking that the Republicans are losing the
fiscal battle in Washington.
Actually, they're winning.
To see this, you just need to step back and look at the tax deal and the
country's fiscal trends from a broader perspective.
Yesterday, the government voted to extend almost all of the Bush Tax Cuts
permanently.
Not temporarily, as a stimulus measure.
Permanently.
Ever since the Bush Tax Cuts were first enacted in 2001, one goal of the
Republican party has been to "make the Bush Tax Cuts permanent."
For most of the last decade, this goal has seemed like an extremist view:
Making the Bush Tax Cuts permanent would drastically reduce the federal
government's revenue. It would also increase inequality and balloon the
national debt and deficit--so how could we possibly justify doing that?
And yet now, suddenly, almost all of the Bush Tax Cuts are permanent.
And the definition of "rich" in America has been significantly increased:
The only Americans subject to a minor increase in income taxes will be
households making more than $450,000 a year.
The Republicans also got another good deal for America's investor and owner
class, making the Bush dividend tax cut permanent. This saves a lot of money
in tax bills for America's wealthier investors.
And the tax deal even socked it to the working class.
How?
By not extending the payroll tax cut.
This payroll tax cut added an extra $2,000 a year in the pockets of everyone
who works for their money. The payroll tax hits everyone who earns wages,
including the richest Americans, but it's a highly "regressive" tax: It
takes a much bigger percentage of the income of those who earn less than $
110,000 a year than it does from the richest Americans.
So the Republicans have won a battle there, too.
It's true that the Republicans have not yet won much ground on the other
front that the party claims to be fighting on--namely spending cuts on
programs that primarily benefit low-income and middle-income Americans (food
stamps, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, unemployment insurance, and so
forth).
But the key word there is "yet."
Yesterday's deal focused only on taxes. The next government fight will be
about spending cuts and the debt ceiling, and the Republicans are already
mobilizing to hold the country hostage and demand entitlement cuts in
exchange for not forcing the U.S. to default. And it seems reasonable to
assume that, no matter how crazy and irresponsible this behavior is, the
Republicans will probably extort some spending-cut concessions in exchange
for agreeing to allow the United States Of America to honor its commitments.
And then there's the big picture, which is also important. The Republicans
are winning there, too.
To listen to Republicans tell it, you would think that the country's tax
burden is suddenly astronomically high, that U.S. citizens are being forced
to fork over more money to the government than ever before.
The truth is the opposite.
As Ben White of Politico observes, thanks to the Reagan revolution and the
Bush Tax Cuts (almost all of which have now been permanently extended), the
federal government is collecting a much lower percent of GDP as tax revenue
than it has for most of the past 50 years.
Specifically, as the chart below shows, the federal government is now
collecting 17% of GDP as tax revenue, versus an average of about 19% in the
past few decades.
One of the broad strategies of those who want to reduce the size of the
federal government is a plan called "Starve the beast."
The goal of that plan is to continue to reduce federal government revenue to
the point where the government simply has no choice but to cut spending,
because deficits have just gotten too large and unsustainable to ignore.
Our deficits are not yet (quite) too large and unsustainable to ignore, but
if we continue on the current path for a few more years, they'll get there.
So what the chart above is telling you is that the Republicans are doing an
excellent job of bringing about Phase 1 of "Starving the beast."
So ignore what you're hearing out of Washington.
The Republicans may not have gotten everything they wanted out of the Fiscal
Cliff deal, but they got almost everything.
And when it comes to the broader fiscal battle, the Republicans are winning:
The federal government's tax revenues are at the lowest level as a percent
of GDP in the past several decades.
The Republicans, in other words, are well on their way to starving the beast. | x*****i
发帖数: 283 | 2 very true, i hate that 2% payroll cut expired | g*q
发帖数: 26623 | 3 2% payroll涨税其实是应该的,但是对应的应该把extended unemployment benefit也取
消掉,这玩艺也不应该是永久的. | t*****9
发帖数: 10416 | 4 2% 对有工作的人来说真是小钱，但是 unemployment benefit 对失业者来说就是全部
收入啦
【在 g*q 的大作中提到】
: 2% payroll涨税其实是应该的,但是对应的应该把extended unemployment benefit也取
: 消掉,这玩艺也不应该是永久的.
| t****9
发帖数: 4491 | 5 2%对于年收入10万一下的中产家庭比rich那4%实在重要得多，中产永远都是政治斗争的
牺牲品。
【在 x*****i 的大作中提到】
: very true, i hate that 2% payroll cut expired
| t********r
发帖数: 2203 | 6 奥黑这么养着，这帮人永远也不拥找工作了
【在 t*****9 的大作中提到】
: 2% 对有工作的人来说真是小钱，但是 unemployment benefit 对失业者来说就是全部
: 收入啦
| t*****9
发帖数: 10416 | 7 木有更好的办法呀，就和死刑一样，实际是对纳税人的钱包判了死刑 ～～～～～～～
～～lol
【在 t********r 的大作中提到】
: 奥黑这么养着，这帮人永远也不拥找工作了
|
|
