y***t
发帖数: 542 | 1 I have a question about whether to take the aircraft during the radiation
emergency. If it becomes really serious in CA, should we take the airplane to
other state? As far as I know, the particles are distributed in
stratosphere the same as the aircraft and the aircraft are not airtight at
all. Is that mean we would expose to more radiation up in the air than on
the ground??? I did not find any official comments about this. Thanks!! |
s****i
发帖数: 2993 | 2 you get more radiation up high. normal china-US flight is about an x-ray. |
y***t
发帖数: 542 | 3 Yes, I know this. But my question is whether there are more radiation
particles(from Japan) in the upper air than lower air.So we should remain
indoors rather than evacuating by plane during the emergency. |
T****r
发帖数: 22092 | 4 你的危险不在于此。
澄清一下，如果你坐的飞机从日本转机一下，危险性要比你从日本上空飞过要小很
多，哪怕是转机是从东京那边绕过，而直飞从福岛上空飞过。
从东京撤出来的人有可能身上沾带着污染物在你近距离威胁你。当然，这个几率有
多大有多小，目前没有人能说清楚。有可能很小，但是也有可能正赶上你倒霉，就
有那么一个危险的家伙被你碰上了。一般来说概率不大，但是最坏的打算的话那就
没法说，边界情况这东西不跟概率走的。
目前来看，你坐飞机到夏威夷再飞回来比前述两种危险性几率更小。
当然，最保险的是你坐飞机从加州飞到德国法国意大利什么的。
【在 y***t 的大作中提到】
: Yes, I know this. But my question is whether there are more radiation
: particles(from Japan) in the upper air than lower air.So we should remain
: indoors rather than evacuating by plane during the emergency.
|
s****i
发帖数: 2993 | 5 to be safe, move to central Africa now. |
