s******n
发帖数: 518 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 History 讨论区 】
发信人: shaodian (有熊), 信区: History
标 题: 反转基因风起云涌：Monsanto的大量欺骗论文
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Aug 28 21:04:09 2018, 美东)
简介：
孟山都作为世界最大的转基因种子公司，还生产草甘磷作为转基因不可缺少的农药。对
于草甘磷的毒性，孟山都购买了很多枪手写了很多科学和科普文章为其产品辩护。
随着最近１００多个法律诉讼，很多机密文件解密，孟山都这些丑恶行径被揭发了出来。
研究发现，孟山都严重影响了正常的科技论文审查程序，对不利于自己的论文采取背后
手段让他们无法发表或者甚至撤回。
The Monsanto Papers: Poisoning the scientific well
Details
Published: 14 August 2018
inShare
roundup gyphosate poisoning well
Monsanto flooded scientific journals with ghostwritten articles and
interfered in the scientific process in order to defend its glyphosate
herbicides
The paper below is a useful peer-reviewed source detailing Monsanto's
deceptive activities aimed at defending glyphosate herbicide, as revealed in
the company's internal documents force-disclosed in US cancer litigation
and obtained by US Right to Know in freedom of information requests.
Monsanto's activities involve the ghostwriting of scientific articles,
secretly sponsoring the pro-GMO website Academics Review, and collusion with
the journal editor A. Wallace Hayes to obtain the retraction of the
Seralini long-term study on the health impacts of a GM maize and the
associated glyphosate-based herbicide.
The paper reminds us that Hayes had a history of defending dangerous
products due to his experience as a tobacco company employee: "In one of the
earliest ghostwriting documents released from tobacco litigation, A.
Wallace Hayes who worked for the R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company in the 1980s
, is the author of a memorandum that details a proposal for a ghost writing
program that would publish studies from toxicological investigations. The
memorandum shows how ghostwritten articles would be reviewed by a panel at
Reynolds prior to submission in Cancer Research or The Journal of the
National Cancer Institute. Tobacco companies such as R. J. Reynolds are
credited with writing the playbook for spinning science subsequently adopted
by pharmaceutical companies and the agrochemical industry."
The paper concludes, "Whether glyphosate or glyphosate-based formulations
such as Roundup are safe is a matter of objective scientific evaluation.
Monsanto, however, has poisoned the well by flooding the scientific journals
with ghostwritten articles and interfering in the scientific process at
multiple levels. This has enormously complicated the task of discovering the
truth. If the company had confidence in the safety of its products, there
would be no need for such behavior, but it is obvious that there are
problems that Monsanto needs to conceal."
---
The Monsanto Papers: Poisoning the scientific well
McHenry, L. B. (2018). International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine, (
Preprint), 1-13.
https://content.iospress.com/articles/international-journal-of-risk-and-
safety-in-medicine/jrs180028
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: Examination of de-classified Monsanto documents from litigation
in order to expose the impact of the company’s efforts to influence the
reporting of scientific studies related to the safety of the herbicide,
glyphosate.
METHODS: A set of 141 recently de-classified documents, made public during
the course of pending toxic tort litigation, In Re Roundup Products
Liability Litigation were examined.
RESULTS: The documents reveal Monsanto-sponsored ghostwriting of articles
published in toxicology journals and the lay media, interference in the peer
review process, behind-the-scenes influence on retraction and the creation
of a so-called academic website as a front for the defense of Monsanto
products.
CONCLUSION: The use of third-party academics in the corporate defense of
glyhphosate reveals that this practice extends beyond the corruption of
medicine and persists in spite of efforts to enforce transparency in
industry manipulation. | l****e
发帖数: 25 | 2 搞基因的百分之九十以上是垃圾。
尤其是医疗领域。估计百分百都不为过。
孟山都不是因为作假
而是因为美帝希望造成全世界粮食紧张。 |
|
