d*******y
发帖数: 322 | 1 Editor's note: C.Y. Leung is the chief executive of the Hong Kong Special
Administrative Region. The opinions expressed in this article are solely his.
Hong Kong (CNN) -- Hong Kong is in the midst of a passionate debate about
our constitutional development. It's a debate we must have. But it's a
debate that must be tempered with reason. Raw emotion -- for or against the
proposed political reform -- will get us nowhere.
It must also be a discussion based on the constitutional framework that
provides for a Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) within China.
Much discussion has centered around the recent decision of the Standing
Committee of the National People's Congress (NPCSC) of China on the
parameters for electing the chief executive (CE) by one-person, one-vote in
2017.
Critics say the nominating framework is too restrictive and that only
candidates favored by Beijing will eventually appear on the ballot.
Hong Kong students boycott classes in democracy protest Hong Kong students
boycott classes in democracy protest
Police block protesters The genesis of the protests
Such claims are unfounded as we have not even started to discuss the
detailed but crucial aspects of the nominating process for potential chief
executive candidates.
This will be the subject of a public consultation to be launched soon and
which will eventually lead to the enabling legislation on changes to the
electoral method for the 2017 election.
READ: Protesters dig in after heated clashes
Election method
On the question of electing the chief executive, the Basic Law, Hong Kong's
"mini-constitution," provides that "the ultimate aim is the selection of the
chief executive by universal suffrage upon nomination by a broadly
representative nominating committee in accordance with democratic procedures
."
To change over to this new election method, the Basic Law requires the
endorsement of a two-thirds majority of all (currently 70) members of the
Legislative Council, the consent of the CE, and be reported to the NPCSC of
China for approval.
Basically, we have two choices: retain the current system by which the CE is
elected by a 1,200-person election committee; or, adopt an enhanced system,
the one recently announced by the NPCSC, that will see two to three
candidates in a full-fledged election at which Hong Kong's five million
eligible voters will exercise this right for the first time.
Historic step
I sincerely hope that legislators will take the historic step forward to
achieve universal suffrage for the election in 2017 as scheduled.
So far the debate has focused on the system per se. But the chief executive'
s unique constitutional position within China also needs to be understood
more clearly in order to fully appreciate the basis for the electoral
process.
Unlike other cities or provinces in China, or for that matter, those in
other countries, the HKSAR enjoys a far higher degree of autonomy in many
areas including our legal system, legislature, internal security,
immigration, customs, economy, finances, trade, industry, commerce, shipping
, aviation, education, sport, religion and external affairs.
All these are enshrined in our Basic Law. These additional powers are
devolved from the Central People's Government. This is why the central
government has the power to appoint the chief executive as well as principal
officials.
This is also why the central government has a constitutional role in
approving any changes to the electoral method for the chief executive.
Hong Kong is society with a deep respect for the rule of law. It is the
pillar of our success. Our common law system and an independent judiciary
are protected by the Basic Law which I, as the chief executive, have pledged
to uphold and protect.
It is my fundamental and constitutional duty to work towards the goal of
electing the chief executive by universal suffrage within that legal
framework. |
|
