由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Military版 - 经济学人:Setting sail for Libya
相关主题
俄罗斯评中国航母出海:抄袭和野心Arming Gaddafi Explodes in China's Face
中国撤侨给美国“上一课”:谁是超级大国?利比亚反卡扎菲武装种族屠杀,过渡政府不予调查
民主的胜利:印度18000人被困利比亚求救卡扎菲在逃的儿子被抓到了?
美国严重干预利比亚内政Three years after US-NATO intervention, Libya is a failed state
从广播用词看加拿大媒体对利比亚局势的态度【Financial Times】China’s first aircraft carrier takes to sea
Breaking News: Allies Reject Libya Cease-Fire Offer卡扎菲当年搞革命怎么那么容易
中国要求立即停战StevenQueen, 该向FBI举报的在这里
利比亚石油开抢(中国合同谈判上have political issues)These senseless nationalists are a shame
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: china话题: chinese话题: libya话题: pla话题: dispatch
进入Military版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
u***r
发帖数: 4825
1
Setting sail for Libya
http://www.economist.com/blogs/asiaview/2011/03/chinas_foreign_
FOR a fast rising power, China remains unusually shy about military
deployment beyond its shores. But its decision to dispatch four military
transport aircraft to Libya and a guided-missile frigate to waters nearby
suggests that it might be rethinking its posture. The Ilyushin-76 aircraft
took off from the far western region of Xinjiang on February 28th bound for
the Libyan city of Sabha. The ship, Xuzhou, which had been engaged in anti-
piracy duties in the Gulf of Aden, set sail for the north African coast on
February 24th.
The assignments could prove little more than symbolic. Of the 30,000 Chinese
estimated to have been in Libya when the unrest began there, some 29,000
are said to have already left the country. China’s defence ministry says
Xuzhou will not arrive until March 2nd. It is not clear when the aircraft
will reach their destination. Gabriel Collins and Andrew Erickson of China
SignPost say they will have to stop for refuelling.
The deployments are a sign that China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA),
which includes the air force and navy, is gaining a bit in confidence
following its dispatch of a small flotilla in December 2008 to join
international operations in the Gulf of Aden. That was a turning point in
China’s military history: the PLA navy’s first active-duty deployment
beyond east Asia. China had long been diffident about long-range engagements
, fearing they might stir fears about China’s military ambitions and reveal
frailties to potential enemies (America being the biggest concern).
Western powers have long been trying to cajole the PLA into a more dynamic
role, both in UN peacekeeping (China is a big contributor of troops, but not
of front-line ones) and disaster relief (the PLA did not send forces to
help out after the Indian Ocean tsunami of December 2004). The PLA’s
decision to get involved this time, however, is likely far more to do with
domestic considerations than a desire to show solidarity with the West. A
perceived failure by the PLA to show concern for Chinese lives in Libya
would not have gone down well with the country’s fiery online nationalists
(to whom the country’s leaders appear to pay considerable attention).
In 1998, when riots targeting ethnic Chinese broke out in Indonesia,
nationalists in China accused the government of a limp-wristed response (
see this analysis of the event by Christopher Hughes of the London School
of Economics). The Communist Party does not want a repeat of that,
especially at a time when it is already worried about possible contagion
from the prodemocracy movements in North Africa and the Middle East.
Nationalism and anti-government sentiment can be a powerful cocktail in
China.
China’s propaganda machinery has been playing up the significance of the
deployments. What the state-run media call the biggest operation in China’s
history – which includes the dispatch of civilian aircraft -- to rescue
Chinese overseas is being touted as a sign of the country’s emergence as a
“responsible great power” (see this dispatch in Chinese on the website of
Guangming Daily, a Beijing newspaper). The term echoes the appeal made in
2005 by Robert Zoellick, then America’s deputy secretary of state, for
China to play its part as a “responsible stakeholder”. It is one aimed at
pleasing nationalists at home while trying to show the outside world that
China is merely doing what is expected of it.
China’s vote on February 26th in favour of a UN resolution imposing
sanctions on Muammar Qaddafi and calling for an international war crimes
investigation will certainly be looked at with favour by the West. It too
appeared to mark a shift: China having usually avoided punishing countries
for behaviour within their borders (sanctions imposed on North Korea for its
testing of nuclear devices being a notable recent exception). Again, the
reasons for China’s actions are likely to be domestic. Mr Qaddafi’s
political control appears tenuous and Chinese lives are at risk. The
Communist Party does not want to appear to be propping up the man
endangering them.
China has long condemned what it describes as “interfering in other
countries’ internal affairs”. Since 1989 it has been particularly fearful
of setting a precedent for international action against itself should it
stage another bloody crackdown on dissent such as on the Tiananmen Square
protests that year. But China sees the situation in Libya as very different
from that in China after Tiananmen when the Chinese leadership, despite its
squabbles, maintained a firm grip on power and largely kept the armed forces
on side.
A blog entry published on February 27th on the website of Caijing, a Beijing
magazine, (here, in Chinese), suggested that it was time to give up the non
-interference policy in the case of Libya. The article, boldly titled “
Support the dispatch of American troops to Libya”, argued that “human
rights come before sovereignty”. Its author, a Chinese journalist, said
that when “a tyrant enslaves his country and tyrannises and massacres his
citizens” talk of non-interference is “dog farts”. That, very probably,
is going further than the party would like.
p******u
发帖数: 14642
2
流氓小白兔,谁也挡不住

for

【在 u***r 的大作中提到】
: Setting sail for Libya
: http://www.economist.com/blogs/asiaview/2011/03/chinas_foreign_
: FOR a fast rising power, China remains unusually shy about military
: deployment beyond its shores. But its decision to dispatch four military
: transport aircraft to Libya and a guided-missile frigate to waters nearby
: suggests that it might be rethinking its posture. The Ilyushin-76 aircraft
: took off from the far western region of Xinjiang on February 28th bound for
: the Libyan city of Sabha. The ship, Xuzhou, which had been engaged in anti-
: piracy duties in the Gulf of Aden, set sail for the north African coast on
: February 24th.

1 (共1页)
进入Military版参与讨论
相关主题
These senseless nationalists are a shame从广播用词看加拿大媒体对利比亚局势的态度
美国历史课本中的蒋介石Breaking News: Allies Reject Libya Cease-Fire Offer
疮破首席经济顾问和白人至上份子勾搭被抓包中国要求立即停战
自称民族主义者,床铺自己都不政治正确了利比亚石油开抢(中国合同谈判上have political issues)
俄罗斯评中国航母出海:抄袭和野心Arming Gaddafi Explodes in China's Face
中国撤侨给美国“上一课”:谁是超级大国?利比亚反卡扎菲武装种族屠杀,过渡政府不予调查
民主的胜利:印度18000人被困利比亚求救卡扎菲在逃的儿子被抓到了?
美国严重干预利比亚内政Three years after US-NATO intervention, Libya is a failed state
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: china话题: chinese话题: libya话题: pla话题: dispatch