w********h
发帖数: 12367 | 1 http://www.biosis.org/press/2004/8249664/
Chemistry
(1) J. Fraser Stoddart
Saul Winstein Professor of Organic Chemistry
University of California at Los Angeles
Los Angeles, Calif., USA
For pioneering research in molecular self-assembly, which promises great
advances in the fabrication of nanoscale machinery and microelectron
(2) George M. Whitesides
Mallinckrodt Professor of Chemistry
Harvard University
Cambridge, Mass., USA
For pioneering research in molecular self-assembly, which promises grea | c*****e
发帖数: 238 | 2 Why so biased on chemistry?
I just checked the link, they have all the scientific Nobel predictions.
Anyway, I think the chemistry is at least OK, but the physics is just too
superficial. If the three guys could win the prize, they would have done it
already. There seems to be no way to award those almost metaphysical physicists
Personally I think the chemistry prize would much probably go to those doing
synthesis, especially natural product.
The physics prize, if is awarded to theory people, ma
【在 w********h 的大作中提到】
: http://www.biosis.org/press/2004/8249664/
: Chemistry
: (1) J. Fraser Stoddart
: Saul Winstein Professor of Organic Chemistry
: University of California at Los Angeles
: Los Angeles, Calif., USA
: For pioneering research in molecular self-assembly, which promises great
: advances in the fabrication of nanoscale machinery and microelectron
: (2) George M. Whitesides
: Mallinckrodt Professor of Chemistry
| c*s
发帖数: 2145 | 3 till now, the prediction of Physiology or Medicine is totally wrong, hehe
let see chemistry
【在 w********h 的大作中提到】
: http://www.biosis.org/press/2004/8249664/
: Chemistry
: (1) J. Fraser Stoddart
: Saul Winstein Professor of Organic Chemistry
: University of California at Los Angeles
: Los Angeles, Calif., USA
: For pioneering research in molecular self-assembly, which promises great
: advances in the fabrication of nanoscale machinery and microelectron
: (2) George M. Whitesides
: Mallinckrodt Professor of Chemistry
| w********h
发帖数: 12367 | 4 only think this one is related to this board.
and only this prediction is reasonable. anyway, let's wait and see.
definitely there should be a prize for "controlled polymerization".
physicists
are
useful
【在 c*****e 的大作中提到】
: Why so biased on chemistry?
: I just checked the link, they have all the scientific Nobel predictions.
: Anyway, I think the chemistry is at least OK, but the physics is just too
: superficial. If the three guys could win the prize, they would have done it
: already. There seems to be no way to award those almost metaphysical physicists
: Personally I think the chemistry prize would much probably go to those doing
: synthesis, especially natural product.
: The physics prize, if is awarded to theory people, ma
| c*s
发帖数: 2145 | 5 I agree, either atrp or zigler-natta
it
doing
physicists
Shiley
【在 w********h 的大作中提到】
: only think this one is related to this board.
: and only this prediction is reasonable. anyway, let's wait and see.
: definitely there should be a prize for "controlled polymerization".
:
: physicists
: are
: useful
| b******l
发帖数: 2 | 6 For ATRP, I don't think it will have a good chance to be commercialized--most
customers complained about the copper contamination; almost impossible to get
rid of copper and ligands completely in such a big viscous system. ATRP might
only be a very classical beauty-on-paper case (sadly...).
well, this might be another year full of surprise for Nobels in Chemistry...
too
great
great
great
【在 c*s 的大作中提到】
: I agree, either atrp or zigler-natta
:
: it
: doing
: physicists
: Shiley
| c*s
发帖数: 2145 | 7
commercialized--most
get
might
I like this surprise, haha
predictions.
done
【在 b******l 的大作中提到】
: For ATRP, I don't think it will have a good chance to be commercialized--most
: customers complained about the copper contamination; almost impossible to get
: rid of copper and ligands completely in such a big viscous system. ATRP might
: only be a very classical beauty-on-paper case (sadly...).
: well, this might be another year full of surprise for Nobels in Chemistry...
:
: too
: great
: great
: great
| c*s
发帖数: 2145 | 8 Alivisatos?
Chemistry...
just
those
microelectron
【在 c*s 的大作中提到】
:
: commercialized--most
: get
: might
: I like this surprise, haha
: predictions.
: done
| c*****e
发帖数: 238 | 9 Well, the Nobel Physics Prize has been announced.
Politzer, Wilczek, and Gross got it, exactly as I expected.
Actually I did not dare mention these guys, but thought that they are the most
probable winners.
Show off Yi xia
【在 w********h 的大作中提到】
: only think this one is related to this board.
: and only this prediction is reasonable. anyway, let's wait and see.
: definitely there should be a prize for "controlled polymerization".
:
: physicists
: are
: useful
|
|
