Immigration版 - XM0405 RFE求助 网站主流媒体 和 contribution is major siginificance |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o******r
发帖数: 168 | 1 XM0405 RFE求助 网站主流媒体 和 contribution is major siginificance
洋洋洒洒rfe写了十页，真心被移民官的敬业折服了。
------------------------media report---------------------
The petitioner has
not provided any documentation which demonstrates that XXX or
XXX are major media. It should also be noted that the list of websites which
the petitioner claims
has featured his app is not sufficient. lt is the petitioner's
responsibility to provide
information on each individual site and provide evidence which clearly shows
that these are
examples of major media. Please note that providing information taken
directly from each website's
own page regarding monthly visitors and hit information will not suffice.
The petitioner must
provide such information from independent outside sources.
------------------------original contribution---------------------
The petitioner also provided copies of his peer-reviewed articles published
in scientific journals
and notes that his work has received citations in both the U.S. and abroad.
lt is reasonable to
expect that other scientists will build upon the past work of others in
order to continue building upon
the findings of that research and contribute to the general knowledge of
that field or discipline. It is
also expected that other researchers will likely use the findings of other
studies in their work if it
relates to their subject matter in some way or, even if it is unrelated, may
use such study results will
to increase their understanding and knowledge of a related topic.
Additionally, although the petitioner notes to his contributions in helping
improve wireless
infrastructure in commercial buildings and high definition satellites, he
has not provided evidence
which indicates that these have attracted worldwide attention and acclaim or
have been implemented
on a wide-scale and significant basis.
Finally, the petitioner points to his contributions as software and
applications developer with his
current employer as evidence that he meets this criterion. lt is expected
that in the course of his
duties and responsibilities, he will make contributions which will both be
improvements to existing
software systems and create new systems and programs which will boost
productivity and efficiency
and enhance customer service and customer user experiences.
It should also be noted that some of the letters submitted emphasize the
future impact and the
promise that the petitioner's work may have in the field. While some of the
letters note the
advances his work have made to the general knowledge base and how his
research has the
potential to provide additional breakthroughs, this is not sufficient. The
documentation provided
in support of this criterion must demonstrate the impact that the petitioner
's work has already
made or is making in his field of endeavor and not focus on what future
benefits may be gained
from his work in the field. A petitioner who claims to have made original
contributions of such a
caliber to the field should be able to provide ample independent and
objective evidence that he
meets this criterion.
To assist in determining whether the beneficiary's contributions are
original and of major
significance in the field, the petitioner may submit:
Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary's
contribution to the field.
Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider the
beneficiary’s work important.
Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the beneficiary'
s
contributions of major significance.
Evidence that the beneficiary's major significant contribution(s) has
provoked
widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited.
Evidence of the beneficiary's work being implemented by others. Possible
evidence may include but is not limited to:
Contracts with companies using the beneficiary's products;
Licensed technology being used by others;
Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the
field.
这是不是模板rfe回复啊？怎么破？ | C*********r
发帖数: 2671 | 2 好好挖掘下吧 感觉你的推荐信也不是很针对性
为什么要claim media呢 不走老三样？ | L**i
发帖数: 22365 | 3 eb1b？
感觉把PL和RL驳斥的体无完肤啊
PL谁写的？推荐信里居然出现了future和promise，这不是大忌么
具体楼主claim啥媒体了？贴出来看看
background也写一下，要不没法建议
ps：此io还挺认真，而且回复的都在点上 | o******r
发帖数: 168 | 4 码农一枚，开发产品，几乎没做reviewer。
【在 C*********r 的大作中提到】
: 好好挖掘下吧 感觉你的推荐信也不是很针对性
: 为什么要claim media呢 不走老三样？
| o******r
发帖数: 168 | 5 DIY的，本来推荐信4封用来NIW的，没改动直接用在eb1a上。
这些推荐信要不要重新修改提交？
背景很弱，6篇不同领域英文文章，25个引用，10多个IT软件系统，用户量几千到几百
万不等，一个国家级的奖。深圳电视台，还有一些类似newsrx.com 的网站报道。如何
证明网站媒体是主流的？
【在 L**i 的大作中提到】
: eb1b？
: 感觉把PL和RL驳斥的体无完肤啊
: PL谁写的？推荐信里居然出现了future和promise，这不是大忌么
: 具体楼主claim啥媒体了？贴出来看看
: background也写一下，要不没法建议
: ps：此io还挺认真，而且回复的都在点上
| z*****o
发帖数: 5758 | 6 NIW 直接用在EB1A？ 这个有点太想当然了吧。
推荐信必须好好写啊，俺的O-1推荐信改了好几篇还觉得不是很满意。
【在 o******r 的大作中提到】
: DIY的，本来推荐信4封用来NIW的，没改动直接用在eb1a上。
: 这些推荐信要不要重新修改提交？
: 背景很弱，6篇不同领域英文文章，25个引用，10多个IT软件系统，用户量几千到几百
: 万不等，一个国家级的奖。深圳电视台，还有一些类似newsrx.com 的网站报道。如何
: 证明网站媒体是主流的？
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
