k*****o
发帖数: 983 | 1 收到RFE。
我的背景比较弱，claim了award，authorship和contribution。
IO是NSC XM0390，只承认了authorship，其他两样和totality都没有承认。
因为review很少，只有3，所以没有claim这条，现在长到5，还给一个会议review
abstract好多篇，这个算数吗？可以放弃award，claim review吗？
以下是RFE内容：似乎是模板
Award
claim了一个Young Investigator Award(PhD期间得的)；AHA postdoc fellowship；还
有一个会议的research recognition award（其实也是一个postdoc award）。
The evidence of record does not establish that the awards are nationally or
internationally recognized awards for excellence in the field of physiology.
All of these awards were granted during the beneficiary’s doctoral
education or postdoctoral work, essentially when the beneficiary was still
gaining the education and experience required to enter the field of endeavor
. Generally, such honors are not considered to be nationally or
internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in the field of
endeavor, because they are generally given to students or early career
professionals in the field and inherently exclude established professionals
who have already achieved excellence in the field of endeavor. This
criterion has not been met.（这条不符合，都是博士和博士后期间得的奖，不是给
有成就的人的）
To show that they are nationally or internationally recognized prizes or
awards for excellence in the field, the petitioner may submit documentary
evidence demonstrating the following:（让提供以下证据）
The criteria used to grant the prizes or awards;
The significance of the prizes or awards, to include the national or
international recognition that the prizes or awards share;
The reputation of the organization or panel granting the prizes or awards;
Who is considered for the prizes or awards, including the geographic scope
for which candidates may apply;
How many prizes or awards are awarded each year; and,
Previous winners of the awards.
Documentary evidence describing how the prizes or awards relate to
excellence in the beneficiary’s field.
Documentary evidence of the criteria used to grant the prizes or awards,
including evidence that a criterion for winning the prizes or awards was
excellence in the field.
Note: For any prize or award submitted, please also provide:
A cipy of each prize or award certification; or
A clear photograph of each prize or award; or
Public announcement regarding the awarding of the prizes or awards issued by
the granting organization.
contribution
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary’s contributions are considered to be of major
significance in the field of endeavor. It is noted that the beneficiary has
made significant, novel contributions to the field of science. However,
nearly all research scientists conduct research and publish findings in
scholarly publications and other media. In order for a body of research to
be considered an original contribution of major significance, it must have
influence and/or an impact in the field as demonstrated by objective
evidence. Examples include a vast amount of independent citations by
numerous research articles, evidence that the findings made in the research
has revolutionized the field of endeavor, or other objective evidence to
show the significance of the research findings.
To assist in determining whether the beneficiary’s contributions are
original and of major significance in the field, the petitioner may submit:
（让提供以下证据）
Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary’s
contribution to the field.
Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider the
beneficiary’s work important.
Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the beneficiary
’s contributions of major significance
Evidence that the beneficiary’s major significant contribution(s) has
provoked widespread pubic commentary in the field or has been widely cited
Evidence of the beneficiary’s work being implemented by others. Possible
evidence may include but is not limited to:
Contracts with companies using the beneficiary’s products;
Licensed technology being used by others;
Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the field.
Note: Letters and testimonies, if submitted, must provide as much detail as
possible about the beneficiary’s contribution and must explain, in detail,
how the contribution was “original” (not merely replicating the work of
others) and how they were of “major” significance. Genereal statements
regarding the importance of the endeavors which are not supported by
documentary evidence are insufficient.
各位大牛有什么建议吗，当时刷号看到前后的好多140都在4月份批了，不知道是pp的还
是non-pp的，所以就pp了，虽然知道背景弱可能会RFE，不过有点急所以pp了。
忘了还有一条，说有非英文的材料，需要提供certified翻译。有中文的引用文章，这
个应该自己翻一下，然后加一张纸说明自己both fluent in english and chinese就可
以吧 |
j****t
发帖数: 1663 | |
j****t
发帖数: 1663 | 3 还有就是再要几封新的推荐信，证明你动作得到了广泛的引用。大蜜蜂有一个系列的帖
子讲这个。
对抗RFE全系列 ：
http://mitbbs.com/article_t/Immigration/32190559.html |
k*****o
发帖数: 983 | 4 多谢回复！
review攒多少呢，给review meeting abstract算不算数呢？
也没少发信，不过人品大概太差，review都没有回信的。
只有大概2个月的话，不知道时间够不够呢 |
k*****o
发帖数: 983 | 5 是打算再要推荐信的。
可能原来的写的不够好，IO没有被impress吧 |
j****t
发帖数: 1663 | 6 据说要10-15个以上比较保险。
多骚扰几个editor,或者找认识的师兄、姐以及导师给提供一下审稿的机会。有认识的
editor熟人的话就更好了。
review meeting abstract应该也算的
【在 k*****o 的大作中提到】
: 多谢回复！
: review攒多少呢，给review meeting abstract算不算数呢？
: 也没少发信，不过人品大概太差，review都没有回信的。
: 只有大概2个月的话，不知道时间够不够呢
|
N*********e
发帖数: 293 | 7 你这一pp如果没有大的改善估计是挂了
感觉lz有点急功近利，背景弱的就不要pp，耐着性子攒文章审稿走正常file途径。。。
事后诸葛亮，不好意思
or
【在 k*****o 的大作中提到】
: 收到RFE。
: 我的背景比较弱，claim了award，authorship和contribution。
: IO是NSC XM0390，只承认了authorship，其他两样和totality都没有承认。
: 因为review很少，只有3，所以没有claim这条，现在长到5，还给一个会议review
: abstract好多篇，这个算数吗？可以放弃award，claim review吗？
: 以下是RFE内容：似乎是模板
: Award
: claim了一个Young Investigator Award(PhD期间得的)；AHA postdoc fellowship；还
: 有一个会议的research recognition award（其实也是一个postdoc award）。
: The evidence of record does not establish that the awards are nationally or
|
b*******e
发帖数: 24532 | 8 very difficult to claim award.
【在 k*****o 的大作中提到】
: 收到RFE。
: 我的背景比较弱，claim了award，authorship和contribution。
: IO是NSC XM0390，只承认了authorship，其他两样和totality都没有承认。
: 因为review很少，只有3，所以没有claim这条，现在长到5，还给一个会议review
: abstract好多篇，这个算数吗？可以放弃award，claim review吗？
: 以下是RFE内容：似乎是模板
: Award
: claim了一个Young Investigator Award(PhD期间得的)；AHA postdoc fellowship；还
: 有一个会议的research recognition award（其实也是一个postdoc award）。
: The evidence of record does not establish that the awards are nationally or
|
e******r
发帖数: 9977 | 9 对呀，而且我的理解是，现在改claim review已然来不及了。只能将错就错补救award。
【在 b*******e 的大作中提到】
: very difficult to claim award.
|
k*****o
发帖数: 983 | 10 夏花版主有什么建议吗，怎么补救award？
除了开信证明criteria之类的，还能怎么弄呢？
award。
【在 e******r 的大作中提到】
: 对呀，而且我的理解是，现在改claim review已然来不及了。只能将错就错补救award。
|
|
|
m***i
发帖数: 4637 | 11 多少人的经验教训了
好好攒review吧
【在 k*****o 的大作中提到】
: 收到RFE。
: 我的背景比较弱，claim了award，authorship和contribution。
: IO是NSC XM0390，只承认了authorship，其他两样和totality都没有承认。
: 因为review很少，只有3，所以没有claim这条，现在长到5，还给一个会议review
: abstract好多篇，这个算数吗？可以放弃award，claim review吗？
: 以下是RFE内容：似乎是模板
: Award
: claim了一个Young Investigator Award(PhD期间得的)；AHA postdoc fellowship；还
: 有一个会议的research recognition award（其实也是一个postdoc award）。
: The evidence of record does not establish that the awards are nationally or
|
k*****o
发帖数: 983 | 12 大蜜蜂有什么建议吗？
【在 b*******e 的大作中提到】
: very difficult to claim award.
|
d**********9
发帖数: 165 | 13 我有eb1a rfe然后通过的经历。建议：
1。放弃award (just say give up claiming...).集中精力论证contribution
2。contribution我当时也被rfe研究的影响(impact).我列了一个表格，列举了引用和
应用我的研究成果的人和机构，然后分别详述。另外我多要了3封推荐信。
or
【在 k*****o 的大作中提到】
: 收到RFE。
: 我的背景比较弱，claim了award，authorship和contribution。
: IO是NSC XM0390，只承认了authorship，其他两样和totality都没有承认。
: 因为review很少，只有3，所以没有claim这条，现在长到5，还给一个会议review
: abstract好多篇，这个算数吗？可以放弃award，claim review吗？
: 以下是RFE内容：似乎是模板
: Award
: claim了一个Young Investigator Award(PhD期间得的)；AHA postdoc fellowship；还
: 有一个会议的research recognition award（其实也是一个postdoc award）。
: The evidence of record does not establish that the awards are nationally or
|
m*******u
发帖数: 679 | 14 How did you describe your contribution in the PL? What kind of evidences
have you provided already? |
k*****o
发帖数: 983 | 15 多谢建议，我也想把重点放在contribution上。
如果只是引用了我的文章，但是并没有详细的论述，这种情况下可以说我的研究很重要
吗？
有一本书引用了我的一篇文章，但是书的作者拒绝给推荐信，可以直接说自己的文章很
重要，他的书才引用了吗？或者说他的书里的应用，是建立在我的研究的基础上的？但
是实际上里面引用了几百篇文献呢吧
【在 d**********9 的大作中提到】
: 我有eb1a rfe然后通过的经历。建议：
: 1。放弃award (just say give up claiming...).集中精力论证contribution
: 2。contribution我当时也被rfe研究的影响(impact).我列了一个表格，列举了引用和
: 应用我的研究成果的人和机构，然后分别详述。另外我多要了3封推荐信。
:
: or
|
k*****o
发帖数: 983 | 16 主要是引用我的文章的一些总结，首先说发了多少文章，然后说有个牛人引用了，有本
书引用了，等等，都说了一遍，不过似乎IO没看到？也有可能IO认为不重要？
【在 m*******u 的大作中提到】
: How did you describe your contribution in the PL? What kind of evidences
: have you provided already?
|
K*N
发帖数: 7494 | |
l****G
发帖数: 1197 | 18 bless
or
【在 k*****o 的大作中提到】
: 收到RFE。
: 我的背景比较弱，claim了award，authorship和contribution。
: IO是NSC XM0390，只承认了authorship，其他两样和totality都没有承认。
: 因为review很少，只有3，所以没有claim这条，现在长到5，还给一个会议review
: abstract好多篇，这个算数吗？可以放弃award，claim review吗？
: 以下是RFE内容：似乎是模板
: Award
: claim了一个Young Investigator Award(PhD期间得的)；AHA postdoc fellowship；还
: 有一个会议的research recognition award（其实也是一个postdoc award）。
: The evidence of record does not establish that the awards are nationally or
|
y******n
发帖数: 8667 | |
