m********1
发帖数: 681 | 1 没有h1b，没有交了485的AOS，140 ead算什么？ USCIS不解决这个问题，一切都白搭。 |
d*********y
发帖数: 748 | 2 那就跟DACA一样了，真正成了非法移民了。格老早就跟DHS挑明了这一点。
[发表自未名空间手机版 - m.mitbbs.com]
【在 m********1 的大作中提到】
: 没有h1b，没有交了485的AOS，140 ead算什么？ USCIS不解决这个问题，一切都白搭。
|
b********e
发帖数: 595 | |
c*******n
发帖数: 2629 | 4 如果真解决这个问题，就牛了啊。140 EAD取代目前485的EAD，485的EAD就更灵活一点
。纯属拍脑袋乱说，。。。 |
k******o
发帖数: 550 | 5 我以为洋人意图大致是如此的，如果解决身份的话实际就几乎整个绕开H1B了，这个口
子在现在大环境看开的太大了，不太现实。
【在 m********1 的大作中提到】
: 没有h1b，没有交了485的AOS，140 ead算什么？ USCIS不解决这个问题，一切都白搭。
|
h*******9
发帖数: 807 | 6 会不会像opt-h1b gap一样，自动延到h1b生效？
【在 m********1 的大作中提到】
: 没有h1b，没有交了485的AOS，140 ead算什么？ USCIS不解决这个问题，一切都白搭。
|
m*******u
发帖数: 13 | 7 假设给了个身份，那么能工作的人的总量并没有变化，只是原来被迫要离开美国的可以
继续工作，
减少了因为对未来的不确定性造成的问题，也减少了大批要转H的需求，增加了H1B的中
签率。
YY一下。
【在 k******o 的大作中提到】
: 我以为洋人意图大致是如此的，如果解决身份的话实际就几乎整个绕开H1B了，这个口
: 子在现在大环境看开的太大了，不太现实。
|
A****Z
发帖数: 694 | 8 有可能。大公司和他们的说客团往里面早就注了水分。这些金主是不可能好心推动一个
法案，给EB23进门等的自由身。可能只是失业后提供一段短期过渡。
【在 h*******9 的大作中提到】
: 会不会像opt-h1b gap一样，自动延到h1b生效？
|
x**8
发帖数: 1939 | 9 为啥140 ead不能算AOS?
有谁会拦着不准？
【在 m********1 的大作中提到】
: 没有h1b，没有交了485的AOS，140 ead算什么？ USCIS不解决这个问题，一切都白搭。
|
S*****d
发帖数: 930 | 10 I140 portability最重要，换工作不用从头再来。 |
y****e
发帖数: 158 | 11 12/24/2015: Estimated New EAD Applications by I-140 Approved Foreign Worker
and Their Family Members
It is interesting to learn that reportedly, the USCIS is estimating that the
new I-140 EAD program that includes foreign workers themselves and their
spouses and children will be 155,067, less than 179,000 estimated H-4 EADs
that did not involve accompanying spoues or children. Therefore, it appears
that the USCIS planner for I-140 EAD must be looking at a fairly limited
number of foreign workers themselves who would benefit from this reform for
EAD. However, remember that 155,067 include only those I-140 approved
foreign worker who want to use portability based on EAD rather than
nonimmigrant status. Since a large number of I-140 portability beneficiaries
may not change employment using EAD but using nonimmigrant status, when it
comes to the impact in the sense of total number of I-140 approved foreign
workers changing employment with and without EAD will be very large in
numbers! The planner must more look at its impact on mobility of I-140
approved foreign workers (portability) on the nation's economy and retaining
talents in the U.S. In other words, from the perspectives of this reform,
the focus of the reform may be placed on "portability" itself rather than
additional "EADs" produced for the I-140 approved foreign workers. In fact,
this concept will be taken by anti-immigration forces and labor union
backers with less resistance.
Any way, for those who seek EAD, the cost will be similar to DACA EAD
applicants, including $380 (EAD fee) + Biometric Collection ($85) + Photo ($
10).
I-140 EAD will have one other restriction other than 'compelling
circumstances' requirement and requirement of one year or less for visa
cutoff date for EAD renewal: There will be no 90-day approval mandate and no
accompanying interim EAD request available when the EAD is not issued
within 90 days from the application. Ouch!
The proposed I-140 EAD regulation which is expected to be released sooner or
later will be published with a 60-day comment period. Only god knows how
long it will take for the USCIS to complete review of these comments and how
long it will take to decide draft of the legally binding final regulation,
which will again have to go through the OMB review and approval process. For
the reasons, those who have attained I-140 approval will endure patience
for them to see the legally binding final regulation of this reform come
into light. Those who take advantage of the reform for change of employment
have broadly two groups: One group intends to maintain their nonimmigrant
status when they change jobs. The second group includes those who do not or
cannot maintain their nonimmigrant status to port and work for another
employer. For the first group, change of employment can be achieved fairly
in a short period of time after the new regulation is in place, while those
who want to change employment only with the EAD may take quite a long time
to achieve that because of the EAD processing times. There is another caveat
for the second group. They should learn from those who port to new
employment after 180 days of filing of EB-485. A large number of those EB-
485s keep their nonimmigrant status even if they are eligible to get EAD and
keep working on EAD with the same employer or different employer because of
the risk involved. If for some reasons (related to the employers or foreign
workers themselves) pending EB-485 application is denied, the foreign
workers immediately lose their legal status and cannot apply for
nonimmigrant status in the United States, while those who keep and work on
nonimmigrant status can keep their nonimmigrant status even if they face
such mishaps, and try again another green card process. Which option one
should take depends on specific facts of each individual case. They should
seek legal counsel to learn which option fits better for himself or herself.
The second group should also consider the potential risk involved with the
I-140 EAD renewal that will require another proof of 'compelling
circumstances' as well as less than one year to reach the visa cut-off date
in the Visa Bulleltin.
Let's wait and see what other catches or surprises we will find in the
proposed regulation when the proposed regulation is published in the federal
register sooner or later. |
k******o
发帖数: 550 | 12 我同意现实里可能总量变化不大，但是理论上如果给身份是很可怕的。设想如果ICC交
个一百万份PERM/140，然后这些人全进来美国工作是什么状况？印度的排期会变得很可
怕，这个撇开不表，这个动作显然是会导致就业市场的变化的，现在而言即使他们
exploit L1，至少还得在国外为该公司工作一年，交多个H1-B再怎么说一年也就那么多
名额。
【在 m*******u 的大作中提到】
: 假设给了个身份，那么能工作的人的总量并没有变化，只是原来被迫要离开美国的可以
: 继续工作，
: 减少了因为对未来的不确定性造成的问题，也减少了大批要转H的需求，增加了H1B的中
: 签率。
: YY一下。
|
k**i
发帖数: 10191 | |
