o****e
发帖数: 21 | 1 As title, or it can only be on NT?
Thanks in advance. | a*****a
发帖数: 438 | 2 sure, no problem at all..
and actually sql server runs best on win2k
~{!>~} ~{TZ~} oracle (database) ~{5D4sWwVPLa5=~}: ~{!?~} | o****e
发帖数: 21 | 3 Do you mean as a server? Maybe I didn't make my question very clear.
I know there will be no problem to run it as a client. But how about server?
Thanks again.
【在 a*****a 的大作中提到】
: sure, no problem at all..
: and actually sql server runs best on win2k
: ~{!>~} ~{TZ~} oracle (database) ~{5D4sWwVPLa5=~}: ~{!?~}
| f*****c
发帖数: 22 | 4 I installed MS SQL Server 7.0 Chinese Version on my PWIN2K-Server and it runs
quite well.
However, it is said that SQL Server 2000 beta is now available in some warez
site.
BTW, I cannot see any reason why it runs best on win2k?
【在 o****e 的大作中提到】
: Do you mean as a server? Maybe I didn't make my question very clear.
: I know there will be no problem to run it as a client. But how about server?
: Thanks again.
| a*****a
发帖数: 438 | 5 that's because Win2K is far more stable and scalable than
NT4.
The TPC world record was held by Oracle half a year ago(?),
then by SQL Server 2000 on Win2K in June, now by DB2 on
Win2000 (submitted on 7/3)
Check http://www.tpc.org/new_result/ttperf.idc
note this is by PERFORMANCE only - not to mention
PERFORMANCE/PRICE where we all know MSFT beats every other
vendor.
【在 f*****c 的大作中提到】
: I installed MS SQL Server 7.0 Chinese Version on my PWIN2K-Server and it runs
: quite well.
: However, it is said that SQL Server 2000 beta is now available in some warez
: site.
: BTW, I cannot see any reason why it runs best on win2k?
| f*****c
发帖数: 22 | 6 Yes, for tpc-c benchmark.
I am just wondering why DB2 can achieve sth like this. It is the most
slowest DBMS server in the world, :-)
Tghe server is win2k cluster, which is one of the most advanced technologies
MS boast of. But for ordinary PC wihtoug >16 cpu, NT is good enough.
For ordinary win2k server, it seems it will consume more memory than
its ancestor-winnt4 workstation. So I do not think it will have a better
performance if you have less than 256M memory, :-)
Actually, I runned TPC-H be
【在 a*****a 的大作中提到】
: that's because Win2K is far more stable and scalable than
: NT4.
: The TPC world record was held by Oracle half a year ago(?),
: then by SQL Server 2000 on Win2K in June, now by DB2 on
: Win2000 (submitted on 7/3)
: Check http://www.tpc.org/new_result/ttperf.idc
: note this is by PERFORMANCE only - not to mention
: PERFORMANCE/PRICE where we all know MSFT beats every other
: vendor.
|
|
