i*********0
发帖数: 915 | |
T**********t
发帖数: 1604 | 2 Page not found
Sorry, the file you have requested cannot be found on any of our servers at
the address specified. |
i*********0
发帖数: 915 | |
C******r
发帖数: 790 | 4 当初差点申请她lab
她刚发第一篇CSC的时候还有个访谈，里面还抱怨新PI过活不容易，还没拿到NIH经费，
云云
现在早鸟枪换炮，NIH经费拿了一大把，还hhmi
不光此女，还耳闻一个和amy差不多新的PI，界内也已经站住跟脚，但data存在问题，
目前还没有败露，也许永远也不会败露
生存压力面前，造不造假，考验的是职业操守
【在 i*********0 的大作中提到】
: http://www.nature.com/news/2010/101015/full/news.2010.544.html
|
P**l
发帖数: 3722 | 5 把原来html后面的点去掉就行了
at
【在 T**********t 的大作中提到】
: Page not found
: Sorry, the file you have requested cannot be found on any of our servers at
: the address specified.
|
h****u
发帖数: 480 | |
I*****y
发帖数: 6402 | 7 是啊， amy太多了
【在 h****u 的大作中提到】
:
: Amy WHO?
|
a*****y
发帖数: 277 | |
x*****a
发帖数: 972 | 9 我一看标题，第一反应就是Wagers，不过她不是才assistant professor而已么？在干
细胞领域有这么有名么？ |
O******e
发帖数: 4845 | 10 http://www.hhmi.org/research/ecs/wagers_bio.html
【在 x*****a 的大作中提到】
: 我一看标题，第一反应就是Wagers，不过她不是才assistant professor而已么？在干
: 细胞领域有这么有名么？
|
|
|
b*********2
发帖数: 35 | 11 Amy 似乎还不错。跟她联系，回信都比较及时。
再说nature news上的口吻对她还是蛮中性的。不至于太大影响。 |
i*********0
发帖数: 915 | 12 这几年的干细胞会都少不了她呀,小bull一个. |
g********0
发帖数: 6201 | 13 还是美女教授。
【在 i*********0 的大作中提到】
: 这几年的干细胞会都少不了她呀,小bull一个.
|
B**********s
发帖数: 1520 | 14 吐
【在 g********0 的大作中提到】
: 还是美女教授。
|
x*****a
发帖数: 972 | 15 据我本人亲自近距离观察，真的一般～
【在 g********0 的大作中提到】
: 还是美女教授。
|
I*****y
发帖数: 6402 | 16 在生物WSN眼里只要是个女的，就叫美女了，呵呵
吐
【在 B**********s 的大作中提到】
: 吐
|
i*********0
发帖数: 915 | |
l**********n
发帖数: 240 | 18 这么明显的失误（一图两用）对一个PI的影响应该还是挺大的吧。
nature news 把两张图摆出来，好像是在抽人嘴巴。
【在 b*********2 的大作中提到】
: Amy 似乎还不错。跟她联系，回信都比较及时。
: 再说nature news上的口吻对她还是蛮中性的。不至于太大影响。
|
B******f
发帖数: 2489 | 19 两篇的1作是同一人么？如果是，还可以说是1作造的，如果非，多半就是PI造的了
【在 l**********n 的大作中提到】
: 这么明显的失误（一图两用）对一个PI的影响应该还是挺大的吧。
: nature news 把两张图摆出来，好像是在抽人嘴巴。
|
i*********r
发帖数: 5101 | |
|
|
i*********r
发帖数: 5101 | 21 I am wondering those PIs who have 10 to 20 postdocs and been away from bench
for years, how do they
judge the data from their own labs. I don't think this would hurt her too
much since most PIs are in the same
"boat", if she is not overly hated, she should be fine.
by the way, I was not impressed by her science, her stuff maybe a little
inventive, but nothing deep. She seems
to do everything well, very eloquent, but nothing special in science at all.
【在 l**********n 的大作中提到】
: 这么明显的失误（一图两用）对一个PI的影响应该还是挺大的吧。
: nature news 把两张图摆出来，好像是在抽人嘴巴。
|
g****1
发帖数: 261 | 22
bench
too
Most PIs could tell, even been away from bench for years (BTW, she hasn't
been!). I totally disagree that most PIs are in the same 'boat'. This
is really an irresponsible statement.
little
all.
I agree with you on this. Heard her job talk, and I wasn't the only one
unimpressed in the room.
【在 i*********r 的大作中提到】
: I am wondering those PIs who have 10 to 20 postdocs and been away from bench
: for years, how do they
: judge the data from their own labs. I don't think this would hurt her too
: much since most PIs are in the same
: "boat", if she is not overly hated, she should be fine.
: by the way, I was not impressed by her science, her stuff maybe a little
: inventive, but nothing deep. She seems
: to do everything well, very eloquent, but nothing special in science at all.
:
|
i*********r
发帖数: 5101 | 23 No PI would be as dumb as that. But it does not mean she holds a high standard about
the integrity of her science. It is not
unusual now that PIs are pushing the data to their fantasized directions,
and people in their labs are "making"
whatever they want, both are for survival....
Actually it is very sad, but true. This is the most frustrating part for me.
But life goes on, no profession is
perfect I guess. You just have to make sure yourself would not do things
like that.
【在 B******f 的大作中提到】
: 两篇的1作是同一人么？如果是，还可以说是1作造的，如果非，多半就是PI造的了
|
p******d
发帖数: 3737 | |
i*********0
发帖数: 915 | 25 是一个人.
那个opn+的nicke细胞好像就是那片blood里面捣鼓出来的吧.
【在 B******f 的大作中提到】
: 两篇的1作是同一人么？如果是，还可以说是1作造的，如果非，多半就是PI造的了
|
