p*******r
发帖数: 4048 | 1 First, you call the editor and get his opinion. If he is on your side,
congratulations. Then, you have to pick out the "unreasonable" comments of the
reviewers and try to say somebody really didn't do his job.
In my case, I got 1 good review and 2 guys saying not suitable for a general
journal. But one guy only wrote 5 lines. So we said that's totally
unreasonable and ask for an additional reviewer, who in the end liked it.
If it's rejection based on technical grounds, then you have to address t | p*******r
发帖数: 4048 | 2 My advice is to write a proposal of experimental revisions on what you think
is reasonable, then discuss with editor and maybe have him forwarding those to
reviewers. If they think there is no way they will be happy with what you
propose to do, forget about it. Otherwise do it.
Remember, you do not have to do all the experiments reviwers propose if you
can argue that it's not indispensible. But also remember, if you agree to do
some substantial additional experiments, the reviwers are usually ha |
|
