s*****u
发帖数: 494 | 1 Both are playing well this season but Yao's performance is better.
Reasons? Here they are.
1. Scoring.
Yao averages 16 PPG compared to Miller's 14.8 PPG. That doesn't tell the whole
story. Look at the team scoring. Kings are right on the top of the league
averaging 105.5 PPG vs Rockets' 87.2 PPG. Conclusion? On the offensive end Yao
means MUCH MUCH MORE to the Rockets than Miller to the Kings.
2. Shooting percentage
Both are great shooters shooting above 50 percent, but as a team Kings shoot
0.4 | m******a
发帖数: 14 | 2 基本同意。不过第一第二两点有部分原因互相矛盾，比如说到Brad得分少，应该提及Kings
的集体作战球风也影响了他的得分绩效。而Team Shooting不该笼统考虑，毕竟Brad客串
大前，Kings的外线FG%也非Rox能比。另外，第四点显然也是很大部分归功于球队战术，
Divac和Brad在内线和YM的功能角色完全不同，单纯从asts数目上讲可以说结论虽未必
大谬但推论未免牵强。
其他的还有太多，比如FG%和OppFG%不可分割，因为球队的攻防策略和方法完全不同，
还有RBs的问题等等，不细说了，总之是篇不错的东东，但暂时还不够细致全面。
【在 s*****u 的大作中提到】
: Both are playing well this season but Yao's performance is better.
: Reasons? Here they are.
: 1. Scoring.
: Yao averages 16 PPG compared to Miller's 14.8 PPG. That doesn't tell the whole
: story. Look at the team scoring. Kings are right on the top of the league
: averaging 105.5 PPG vs Rockets' 87.2 PPG. Conclusion? On the offensive end Yao
: means MUCH MUCH MORE to the Rockets than Miller to the Kings.
: 2. Shooting percentage
: Both are great shooters shooting above 50 percent, but as a team Kings shoot
: 0.4
|
|
